Model comparison

Qwen3.6 Plus vs StarCoder 2 3B

Qwen3.6 Plus has enough public results to be ranked (#54); StarCoder 2 3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3.6 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

47.3

Rank #54 Confirmed

StarCoder 2 3B NVIDIA

35.8

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Qwen3.6 Plus scores higher in 1 category and StarCoder 2 3B in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen3.6 Plus leads 40.6 to 32.9.
  • StarCoder 2 3B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Qwen3.6 Plus and StarCoder 2 3B specifications
Qwen3.6 PlusStarCoder 2 3B
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)NVIDIA
Noometry Index47.335.8
Released2026-03-312024-02-22
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.50—
Output $ / M tokens$3—
Results tracked377

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Qwen3.6 Plus: 40.6 (#125), StarCoder 2 3B: 32.9

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 PlusStarCoder 2 3B
SWE-bench Verified57.9%—
LMArena WebDev1461—
SciCode40.7%—
LMArena Coding1467—
BigCodeBench Complete—21.4%
ALE-Bench670.15—
HumanEval+—27.4%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen3.6 Plus: —, StarCoder 2 3B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 PlusStarCoder 2 3B
Vending-Bench 25,115—

Reasoning Not comparable

Qwen3.6 Plus: 28.5 (#89), StarCoder 2 3B: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 PlusStarCoder 2 3B
Epoch Capabilities Index147.6788.01
NYT Connections (extended)60.3%—
CritPt2.9%—
Chess Puzzles17%—
Thematic Generalization59.5%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1449—
Mystery Game Puzzles12%—
DTBench81.9%—
LMCA33.1%—
WinoGrande—57.1%

Math Not comparable

Qwen3.6 Plus: 50.6 (#44), StarCoder 2 3B: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 PlusStarCoder 2 3B
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)38.2%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202593.3%—
LMArena Math1450—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)26.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)8.3%—
GSM8K—21.6%

Knowledge Not comparable

Qwen3.6 Plus: 56.1 (#40), StarCoder 2 3B: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 PlusStarCoder 2 3B
GPQA Diamond88.4%—
SimpleQA Verified44.1%—
LMArena Expert1456—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—34.2%
MMLU—36.6%

Multilingual Not comparable

Qwen3.6 Plus: 53.5 (#66), StarCoder 2 3B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 PlusStarCoder 2 3B
LMArena Non-English1424—
LMArena Chinese1478—
LMArena French1454—
LMArena German1451—
LMArena Japanese1389—
LMArena Korean1381—
LMArena Russian1434—
LMArena Spanish1432—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Qwen3.6 Plus: 75.2 (#70), StarCoder 2 3B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 PlusStarCoder 2 3B
LMArena Instruction Following1425—

Long Context Not comparable

Qwen3.6 Plus: 45.1 (#48), StarCoder 2 3B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 PlusStarCoder 2 3B
CL-bench20.3%—
LMArena Longer Query1440—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Qwen3.6 Plus: 62.4 (#78), StarCoder 2 3B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 PlusStarCoder 2 3B
LMArena Text1437—
LMArena Creative Writing1405—
LMArena Multi-Turn1438—

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3.6 Plus better than StarCoder 2 3B?

Qwen3.6 Plus has enough public results to be ranked (#54); StarCoder 2 3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is Qwen3.6 Plus or StarCoder 2 3B better for coding?

Qwen3.6 Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.6 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Qwen3.6 Plus and StarCoder 2 3B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Qwen3.6 Plus has 37 scored results on Noometry and StarCoder 2 3B has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper