Model comparison
Qwen3.7 Flash vs QwQ-32B
Qwen3.7 Flash and QwQ-32B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.9 vs 39.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3.7 Flash scores higher in 3 categories and QwQ-32B in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 37.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 86.7% for Qwen3.7 Flash and 59.2% for QwQ-32B.
- QwQ-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Qwen3.7 Flash | QwQ-32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.9 | 39.8 |
| Released | 2026-07-15 | 2024-11-28 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.03 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.13 | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 36 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Qwen3.7 Flash: —, QwQ-32B: 35.4 (#226)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 20.9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 44.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 72.2% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1333 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54.4% |
Reasoning Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108), QwQ-32B: 23.7 (#174)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 23% | 5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 144.64 | 137.6 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 43.8% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 83.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1325 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 15% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65% |
| ForecastBench | — | 58.3 |
| LiveBench | — | 72% |
Math Too close to call
Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140), QwQ-32B: 38.0 (#143)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 86.7% | 59.2% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 19.3% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 77.8% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1359 |
Knowledge Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75), QwQ-32B: 37.2 (#158)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 82.3% | 65.3% |
| Confabulations | — | 15.6% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1324 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen3.7 Flash: —, QwQ-32B: 44.8 (#176)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1305 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1378 |
| LMArena French | — | 1336 |
| LMArena German | — | 1313 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1279 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1297 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1354 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen3.7 Flash: —, QwQ-32B: 72.6 (#137)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.8% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1297 |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen3.7 Flash: —, QwQ-32B: 49.0 (#11)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1308 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen3.7 Flash: —, QwQ-32B: 50.6 (#180)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1329 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1288 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 80.2% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1257 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1314 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 51.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen3.7 Flash better than QwQ-32B?
Qwen3.7 Flash and QwQ-32B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.9 vs 39.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
How many benchmarks do Qwen3.7 Flash and QwQ-32B share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.7 Flash has 7 scored results on Noometry and QwQ-32B has 36.