Model comparison

Qwen3.7 Max vs Qwen3 Coder Plus

Qwen3.7 Max has enough public results to be ranked (#35); Qwen3 Coder Plus does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3.7 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

51.4

Rank #35 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.
  • Qwen3 Coder Plus is cheaper at $1 / $5 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $7.50 for Qwen3.7 Max.
  • Qwen3 Coder Plus accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.
  • Qwen3 Coder Plus has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Qwen3.7 Max and Qwen3 Coder Plus specifications
Qwen3.7 MaxQwen3 Coder Plus
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index51.4—
Released2026-05-192025-07-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M1.05M
Max output131K66K
Input $ / M tokens$2.50$1
Output $ / M tokens$7.50$5
Results tracked331

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Qwen3.7 Max: 50.2 (#43), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.7 MaxQwen3 Coder Plus
ALE-Bench1,189456.5
SWE-bench Verified77.3%—
LMArena WebDev1515—
SciCode48.8%—
LMArena Coding1498—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen3.7 Max: 21.8 (#129), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.7 MaxQwen3 Coder Plus
GBAEval0.4%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Qwen3.7 Max: 48.4 (#36), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.7 MaxQwen3 Coder Plus
SimpleBench70.4%—
NYT Connections (extended)85.1%—
CritPt13.4%—
Chess Puzzles19%—
EBR-Bench9.5%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1483—
Mystery Game Puzzles32%—
DTBench92.3%—
LMCA44%—
Epoch Capabilities Index153.74—

Math Not comparable

Qwen3.7 Max: 62.3 (#26), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.7 MaxQwen3 Coder Plus
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)64.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 434.1%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202595.6%—
ProofBench26%—
LMArena Math1488—

Knowledge Not comparable

Qwen3.7 Max: 61.7 (#24), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.7 MaxQwen3 Coder Plus
GPQA Diamond90.9%—
SimpleQA Verified55.8%—
LMArena Expert1488—

Multilingual Not comparable

Qwen3.7 Max: 57.1 (#13), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.7 MaxQwen3 Coder Plus
LMArena Non-English1475—
LMArena Chinese1533—
LMArena Russian1482—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Qwen3.7 Max: 76.9 (#34), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.7 MaxQwen3 Coder Plus
LMArena Instruction Following1460—

Long Context Not comparable

Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#34), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.7 MaxQwen3 Coder Plus
LMArena Longer Query1484—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Qwen3.7 Max: 65.2 (#52), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.7 MaxQwen3 Coder Plus
LMArena Text1476—
LMArena Creative Writing1450—
EQ-Bench 41110—
LMArena Multi-Turn1482—

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3.7 Max better than Qwen3 Coder Plus?

Qwen3.7 Max has enough public results to be ranked (#35); Qwen3 Coder Plus does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.7 Max or Qwen3 Coder Plus?

Qwen3 Coder Plus is cheaper. It lists at $1 per million input tokens and $5 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Max lists at $2.50 and $7.50.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3 Coder Plus does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks do Qwen3.7 Max and Qwen3 Coder Plus share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Qwen3.7 Max has 33 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Plus has 1.

Related comparisons

Go deeper