Model comparison

Qwen3.8 Max vs Sonar Reasoning Pro

Qwen3.8 Max has enough public results to be ranked (#22); Sonar Reasoning Pro does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3.8 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

56.8

Rank #22 Confirmed

Summary

  • Qwen3.8 Max is cheaper at $2 / $6 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $8 for Sonar Reasoning Pro.
  • Qwen3.8 Max accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

Qwen3.8 Max and Sonar Reasoning Pro specifications
Qwen3.8 MaxSonar Reasoning Pro
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Perplexity
Noometry Index56.8—
Released2026-08-022024-01-01
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M128K
Max output131K4K
Input $ / M tokens$2$2
Output $ / M tokens$6$8
Results tracked391

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Qwen3.8 Max: 53.5 (#29), Sonar Reasoning Pro: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.8 MaxSonar Reasoning Pro
DeepSWE57.5%—
LMArena WebDev1674—
FrontierSWE17.8%—
SciCode53.2%—
LMArena Coding1502—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen3.8 Max: 45.4 (#14), Sonar Reasoning Pro: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.8 MaxSonar Reasoning Pro
APEX-Agents63.3%—
τ²-bench Banking55.1%—
GDP.pdf23.2%—
LMArena Search—1139

Reasoning Not comparable

Qwen3.8 Max: 54.4 (#26), Sonar Reasoning Pro: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.8 MaxSonar Reasoning Pro
NYT Connections (extended)88.3%—
CritPt20%—
Chess Puzzles40%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1496—
Mystery Game Puzzles38%—
DTBench92%—
LMCA46.2%—
Epoch Capabilities Index156.41—

Math Not comparable

Qwen3.8 Max: 73.2 (#20), Sonar Reasoning Pro: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.8 MaxSonar Reasoning Pro
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)74.7%—
FrontierMath Tier 446.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%—
ProofBench58%—
LMArena Math1499—

Knowledge Not comparable

Qwen3.8 Max: 61.7 (#27), Sonar Reasoning Pro: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.8 MaxSonar Reasoning Pro
GPQA Diamond92.7%—
SimpleQA Verified47.3%—
LMArena Expert1507—

Multimodal Not comparable

Qwen3.8 Max: 37.2 (#75), Sonar Reasoning Pro: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.8 MaxSonar Reasoning Pro
LMArena Vision1314—
Furniture Assembly20%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Qwen3.8 Max: 56.7 (#18), Sonar Reasoning Pro: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.8 MaxSonar Reasoning Pro
LMArena Non-English1472—
LMArena Chinese1538—
LMArena French1503—
LMArena German1483—
LMArena Japanese1467—
LMArena Korean1461—
LMArena Russian1481—
LMArena Spanish1492—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Qwen3.8 Max: 77.6 (#17), Sonar Reasoning Pro: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.8 MaxSonar Reasoning Pro
LMArena Instruction Following1479—

Long Context Not comparable

Qwen3.8 Max: 45.6 (#31), Sonar Reasoning Pro: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.8 MaxSonar Reasoning Pro
LMArena Longer Query1489—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Qwen3.8 Max: 67.1 (#30), Sonar Reasoning Pro: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.8 MaxSonar Reasoning Pro
LMArena Text1483—
LMArena Creative Writing1479—
LMArena Multi-Turn1489—

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3.8 Max better than Sonar Reasoning Pro?

Qwen3.8 Max has enough public results to be ranked (#22); Sonar Reasoning Pro does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.8 Max or Sonar Reasoning Pro?

Qwen3.8 Max is cheaper. It lists at $2 per million input tokens and $6 per million output tokens; Sonar Reasoning Pro lists at $2 and $8.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.8 Max does, with 1M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Qwen3.8 Max and Sonar Reasoning Pro share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.8 Max has 39 scored results on Noometry and Sonar Reasoning Pro has 1.

Related comparisons

Go deeper