Model comparison
Qwen3.8 Max vs Yi-Large
Qwen3.8 Max has enough public results to be ranked (#22); Yi-Large does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen3.8 Max leads 53.5 to 36.7.
Side by side
| Qwen3.8 Max | Yi-Large | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 56.8 | 38.1 |
| Released | 2026-08-02 | 2024-05-13 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $6 | — |
| Results tracked | 39 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3.8 Max leads
Qwen3.8 Max: 53.5 (#29), Yi-Large: 36.7 (#203)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.8 Max | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | 57.5% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1674 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 17.8% | — |
| SciCode | 53.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.7% |
| LMArena Coding | 1502 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 47.2% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Qwen3.8 Max: 45.4 (#14), Yi-Large: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.8 Max | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 63.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 55.1% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 23.2% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Qwen3.8 Max: 54.4 (#26), Yi-Large: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.8 Max | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 88.3% | — |
| CritPt | 20% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 40% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1496 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 38% | — |
| DTBench | 92% | — |
| LMCA | 46.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 156.41 | — |
Math Not comparable
Qwen3.8 Max: 73.2 (#20), Yi-Large: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.8 Max | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 74.7% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46.3% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 100% | — |
| ProofBench | 58% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1499 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen3.8 Max: 61.7 (#27), Yi-Large: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.8 Max | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 92.7% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 47.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1507 | — |
| MMLU | — | 79.3% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Qwen3.8 Max: 37.2 (#75), Yi-Large: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.8 Max | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1314 | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 20% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen3.8 Max: 56.7 (#18), Yi-Large: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.8 Max | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1472 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1538 | — |
| LMArena French | 1503 | — |
| LMArena German | 1483 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1467 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1461 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1481 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1492 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen3.8 Max: 77.6 (#17), Yi-Large: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.8 Max | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1479 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen3.8 Max: 45.6 (#31), Yi-Large: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.8 Max | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1489 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen3.8 Max: 67.1 (#30), Yi-Large: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.8 Max | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1483 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1479 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1489 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen3.8 Max better than Yi-Large?
Qwen3.8 Max has enough public results to be ranked (#22); Yi-Large does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Qwen3.8 Max or Yi-Large better for coding?
Qwen3.8 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.5 versus 36.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Qwen3.8 Max and Yi-Large share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.8 Max has 39 scored results on Noometry and Yi-Large has 3.