Model comparison
Qwen3 8B vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Qwen3 8B and Qwen3 Coder Next score almost the same on the Noometry Index (33.7 vs 34.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3 8B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3 Coder Next in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3 Coder Next leads 22.4 to 16.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 22.6% for Qwen3 8B and 32.3% for Qwen3 Coder Next.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper at $0.12 / $0.80 per million input/output tokens, against $0.18 / $0.70 for Qwen3 8B.
- Qwen3 Coder Next accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.
Side by side
| Qwen3 8B | Qwen3 Coder Next | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 34.3 |
| Released | 2025-04 | 2026-02-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 131K | 262K |
| Max output | 8K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.18 | $0.12 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.70 | $0.80 |
| Results tracked | 11 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3 Coder Next leads
Qwen3 8B: 34.0 (#248), Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Qwen3 8B: 30.2 (#78), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3 8B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 42.6% | — |
Reasoning Qwen3 Coder Next leads
Qwen3 8B: 16.6 (#303), Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)
| Benchmark | Qwen3 8B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | 5% | — |
| DTBench | 59.7% | — |
| LMCA | 8.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 136.17 | — |
Math Not comparable
Qwen3 8B: 34.9 (#191), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3 8B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 56.1% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen3 8B: 36.1 (#173), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3 8B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 56.8% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 4.8% | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen3 8B: 37.9 (#210), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3 8B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 62.1% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen3 8B better than Qwen3 Coder Next?
Qwen3 8B and Qwen3 Coder Next score almost the same on the Noometry Index (33.7 vs 34.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3 8B or Qwen3 Coder Next?
Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper. It lists at $0.12 per million input tokens and $0.80 per million output tokens; Qwen3 8B lists at $0.18 and $0.70.
Is Qwen3 8B or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?
Qwen3 Coder Next scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.3 versus 34.0 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3 Coder Next does, with 262K tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do Qwen3 8B and Qwen3 Coder Next share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3 8B has 11 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.