Model comparison

Qwen3 Max vs Sonar

Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index. Sonar costs 2.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3 Max's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

43.5

Rank #82 Confirmed

Sonar Perplexity

37.8

Rank #184 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3 Max leads 62.6 to 52.6.
  • Sonar is cheaper at $1 / $1 per million input/output tokens, against $1.20 / $6 for Qwen3 Max.
  • Qwen3 Max accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

Qwen3 Max and Sonar specifications
Qwen3 MaxSonar
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Perplexity
Noometry Index43.537.8
Released2025-09-232024-01-01
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window262K128K
Max output66K4K
Input $ / M tokens$1.20$1
Output $ / M tokens$6$1
Results tracked337

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3 Max leads

Qwen3 Max: 42.4 (#93), Sonar: 35.1 (#217)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3 MaxSonar
LiveBench Coding—35.1%
LMArena Coding1456—
ALE-Bench370.45—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen3 Max: —, Sonar: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3 MaxSonar
Vending-Bench 271.56—

Reasoning Qwen3 Max leads

Qwen3 Max: 22.0 (#186), Sonar: 20.3 (#221)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3 MaxSonar
Kagi LLM Benchmark72.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)30.1%—
Chess Puzzles4%—
LiveBench Reasoning—46.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts1448—
Mystery Game Puzzles5%—
DTBench82.1%—
LiveBench Data Analysis—37.9%
LMCA28.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index142.41—
LiveBench—46.9%

Math Qwen3 Max leads

Qwen3 Max: 37.6 (#94), Sonar: 31.3 (#197)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3 MaxSonar
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)18.9%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202573.3%—
LiveBench Math—41.6%
LMArena Math1447—
MATH Level 597.1%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Qwen3 Max: 48.1 (#72), Sonar: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3 MaxSonar
GPQA Diamond72.6%—
SimpleQA Verified48.7%—
LMArena Expert1457—

Multilingual Not comparable

Qwen3 Max: 53.9 (#58), Sonar: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3 MaxSonar
LMArena Non-English1429—
LMArena Chinese1479—
LMArena French1450—
LMArena German1463—
LMArena Japanese1399—
LMArena Korean1397—
LMArena Russian1428—
LMArena Spanish1463—

Instruction Following Qwen3 Max leads

Qwen3 Max: 75.0 (#81), Sonar: 71.5 (#146)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3 MaxSonar
LiveBench Instruction Following—76.2%
LMArena Instruction Following1420—

Long Context Not comparable

Qwen3 Max: 41.6 (#129), Sonar: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3 MaxSonar
Fiction.LiveBench66.7%—
CL-bench14.5%—
LMArena Longer Query1439—

Writing & Preference Qwen3 Max leads

Qwen3 Max: 62.6 (#72), Sonar: 52.6 (#166)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3 MaxSonar
LMArena Text1439—
LMArena Creative Writing1401—
LMArena Multi-Turn1446—
LiveBench Language—44.1%

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3 Max better than Sonar?

Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index. Sonar costs 2.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3 Max's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 Max or Sonar?

Sonar is cheaper. It lists at $1 per million input tokens and $1 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Max lists at $1.20 and $6.

Is Qwen3 Max or Sonar better for coding?

Qwen3 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 35.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3 Max does, with 262K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Qwen3 Max and Sonar share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3 Max has 33 scored results on Noometry and Sonar has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper