Model comparison

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct vs Step 3

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Step 3 StepFun

39.9

Rank #145 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct scores higher in 7 categories and Step 3 in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads 52.3 to 46.5.

Side by side

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct and Step 3 specifications
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B InstructStep 3
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)StepFun
Noometry Index42.539.9
Released2025-09—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K—
Max output33K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.50—
Output $ / M tokens$2—
Results tracked2517

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 41.9 (#101), Step 3: 39.5 (#144)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-Next 80B-A3B InstructStep 3
LMArena Coding14411367

Reasoning Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 30.1 (#79), Step 3: 27.6 (#102)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-Next 80B-A3B InstructStep 3
Kagi LLM Benchmark66.7%62.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts14281355

Math Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 36.3 (#118), Step 3: 34.9 (#148)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-Next 80B-A3B InstructStep 3
LMArena Math14401366
Omni-MATH46.7%—

Knowledge Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 41.3 (#102), Step 3: 36.2 (#161)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-Next 80B-A3B InstructStep 3
LMArena Expert14161333
MMLU-Pro78.6%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.3%—
GPQA (HELM)63%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: —, Step 3: 34.9 (#81)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-Next 80B-A3B InstructStep 3
LMArena Vision—1176

Multilingual Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 52.3 (#88), Step 3: 46.5 (#154)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-Next 80B-A3B InstructStep 3
LMArena Non-English14071327
LMArena Chinese14611396
LMArena German14161371
LMArena Korean13661271
LMArena Russian14031331
LMArena Spanish14361372
LMArena French1415—
LMArena Japanese1398—

Instruction Following Too close to call

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 71.0 (#154), Step 3: 70.6 (#159)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-Next 80B-A3B InstructStep 3
LMArena Instruction Following13881332
IFEval81%—

Long Context Step 3 leads

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 37.0 (#218), Step 3: 40.3 (#152)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-Next 80B-A3B InstructStep 3
LMArena Longer Query14031326
Fiction.LiveBench55.6%—

Writing & Preference Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 58.2 (#116), Step 3: 54.5 (#146)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-Next 80B-A3B InstructStep 3
LMArena Text14171351
LMArena Creative Writing13331322
LMArena Multi-Turn14151340
WildBench80.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct better than Step 3?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct or Step 3 better for coding?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.9 versus 39.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct and Step 3 share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct has 25 scored results on Noometry and Step 3 has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper