Model comparison

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 vs Yi-34B

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 StepFun

39.2

Rank #171 Confirmed

Yi-34B 01.AI

27.8

Rank #329 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Step 2 16k Exp 202412 scores higher in 8 categories and Yi-34B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads 35.2 to 7.5.
  • Yi-34B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 and Yi-34B specifications
Step 2 16k Exp 202412Yi-34B
ProviderStepFun01.AI
Noometry Index39.227.8
Released—2023-11-02
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1223

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 38.5 (#174), Yi-34B: 32.3 (#274)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkStep 2 16k Exp 202412Yi-34B
LMArena Coding13161112

Reasoning Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 25.9 (#142), Yi-34B: 21.2 (#226)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkStep 2 16k Exp 202412Yi-34B
LMArena Hard Prompts12991104
BIG-Bench Hard—71.7%
Epoch Capabilities Index—117.39

Math Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 36.3 (#169), Yi-34B: 21.6 (#282)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkStep 2 16k Exp 202412Yi-34B
LMArena Math13041114
MATH Level 5—5.1%
GSM8K—76%

Knowledge Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 35.2 (#187), Yi-34B: 7.5 (#309)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkStep 2 16k Exp 202412Yi-34B
LMArena Expert12791061
GPQA Diamond—14.7%
MMLU—76.3%

Multilingual Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 43.7 (#181), Yi-34B: 29.7 (#264)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkStep 2 16k Exp 202412Yi-34B
LMArena Non-English12901079
LMArena Chinese13311176
LMArena Russian13241050
LMArena French—1081
LMArena German—1042
LMArena Japanese—993
LMArena Korean—959
LMArena Spanish—1070

Instruction Following Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 67.9 (#192), Yi-34B: 56.2 (#274)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkStep 2 16k Exp 202412Yi-34B
LMArena Instruction Following12871091

Long Context Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 39.7 (#170), Yi-34B: 33.2 (#264)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkStep 2 16k Exp 202412Yi-34B
LMArena Longer Query13071094

Writing & Preference Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 52.3 (#173), Yi-34B: 34.1 (#273)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkStep 2 16k Exp 202412Yi-34B
LMArena Text13211129
LMArena Creative Writing13281108
LMArena Multi-Turn12921113

Frequently asked questions

Is Step 2 16k Exp 202412 better than Yi-34B?

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Step 2 16k Exp 202412 or Yi-34B better for coding?

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Step 2 16k Exp 202412 and Yi-34B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Step 2 16k Exp 202412 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Yi-34B has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper