Noometry

Meta, proprietary

Muse Spark 1.1

Muse Spark 1.1 by Meta ranks 51st of 354 ranked models on the Noometry Index as of October 2026, with a score of 49.9. Its strongest category is writing & preference, where it ranks 11th. API pricing starts at $1.25 per million input tokens and $4.25 per million output tokens, with a 1.05M-token context window.

Last verified

Noometry rank
#51 of 354
Index score
49.9
Evidence
Confirmed 37 results
Provider
Meta
Released
April 8, 2026
Weights
Proprietary
Reasoning
Yes
Context window
1.05M
Max output
131K
Input price
$1.25 / M
Output price
$4.25 / M
Blended price
$2 / M
Output speed
Not measured
Value
#144 of 219
Knowledge cutoff
Unknown
Input
text, image, pdf, video

Category scores

Each category score combines every public result we have in that category.

  1. Coding 51.3
  2. Agentic & Tool Use 30.8
  3. Reasoning 47.1
  4. Math 45.5
  5. Knowledge 53.1
  6. Multimodal 42.6
  7. Multilingual 56.7
  8. Instruction Following 76.5
  9. Long Context 44.8
  10. Writing & Preference 73.4
CategoryScoreRankResults
Coding51.3#404
Agentic & Tool Use30.8#734
Reasoning47.1#446
Math45.5#762
Knowledge53.1#592
Multimodal42.6#291
Multilingual56.7#171
Instruction Following76.5#391
Long Context44.8#581
Writing & Preference73.4#115

Strengths and weaknesses

Categories where Muse Spark 1.1 places highest and lowest among the models ranked in each, with its score against that category's median.

Strongest categories

CategoryScorevs medianRank
Writing & Preference73.4+19.7#11 of 312, top 4%
Multilingual56.7+9.3#17 of 297, top 6%
Coding51.3+12.6#40 of 340, top 12%

Weakest categories

CategoryScorevs medianRank
Agentic & Tool Use30.8+0.5#73 of 154, top 48%
Math45.5+8.9#76 of 327, top 24%
Multimodal42.6+4.1#29 of 128, top 23%

Closest competitors

The models ranked just above and below Muse Spark 1.1. When scores are this close, price and speed are often the better way to choose.

ModelRankScoreBlended $/MSpeed
Claude Opus 4.5#4750.5$1013Compare
Muse Spark 1.2#4850.3$2—Compare
MiMo-V2.6-Pro#4950.3$0.54—Compare
Claude Sonnet 4.6#5050.3$6—Compare
Claude Haiku 5.5#5249.5$0.20—Compare
GPT-5.1#5349.0$3.44—Compare
Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)#5448.6$1.5661Compare
MiMo-V2.6-Flash#5548.5$0.18—Compare

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Benchmark results

Every published result we track, with its source. Bold rows are the ones used for ranking; where several exist we prefer independent runs over self-reported numbers.

Coding

BenchmarkScorePositionSettingSourceDate
DeepSWE53.3%#22 of 29, top 76%Epoch AI
LMArena WebDev1542#35 of 113, top 31%LMArena2026-10-08
SciCode58.8%#13 of 121, top 11%Epoch AI
SciCode58.8%xhighEpoch AI
LMArena Coding1498#20 of 294, top 7%LMArena2026-10-08

Agentic & Tool Use

BenchmarkScorePositionSettingSourceDate
APEX-Agents31.8%#43 of 49, top 88%Epoch AI
τ²-bench Banking40.5%#6 of 26, top 24%xhighτ²-bench2026-08-04
GBAEval7.9%#13 of 23, top 57%Epoch AI
GDP.pdf15%#27 of 36, top 75%Epoch AI
GDP.pdf15%mediumEpoch AI
Vending-Bench 26,520#16 of 60, top 27%Epoch AI

Reasoning

BenchmarkScorePositionSettingSourceDate
NYT Connections (extended)84.9%#30 of 91, top 33%high reasoningLech Mazur benchmarks
CritPt15.1%Epoch AI
CritPt15.1%#37 of 134, top 28%xhighEpoch AI
LMArena Hard Prompts1486#21 of 297, top 8%LMArena2026-10-08
DTBench94.4%#23 of 151, top 16%highEpoch AI
LMCA49.9%#22 of 125, top 18%highEpoch AI
Surface Evolver Bench52.5%#15 of 25, top 60%highEpoch AI
Epoch Capabilities Index154.21#37 of 213, top 18%Epoch AI2026-07-09

Math

BenchmarkScorePositionSettingSourceDate
ProofBench39%#36 of 77, top 47%Epoch AI
LMArena Math1483#25 of 285, top 9%LMArena2026-10-08

Knowledge

BenchmarkScorePositionSettingSourceDate
SimpleQA Verified57.8%#17 of 77, top 23%Epoch AI2026-08-31
LMArena Expert1478#43 of 273, top 16%LMArena2026-10-08

Multimodal

BenchmarkScorePositionSettingSourceDate
LMArena Vision1293#21 of 122, top 18%LMArena2026-10-09
LMArena Document1465#15 of 38, top 40%LMArena2026-09-13

Multilingual

BenchmarkScorePositionSettingSourceDate
LMArena Non-English1472#17 of 297, top 6%LMArena2026-10-08
LMArena Chinese1518#29 of 285, top 11%LMArena2026-10-08
LMArena French1494#16 of 223, top 8%LMArena2026-10-08
LMArena German1466#30 of 231, top 13%LMArena2026-10-08
LMArena Japanese1451#24 of 211, top 12%LMArena2026-10-08
LMArena Korean1458#13 of 213, top 7%LMArena2026-10-08
LMArena Russian1483#17 of 283, top 7%LMArena2026-10-08
LMArena Spanish1464#31 of 226, top 14%LMArena2026-10-08

Instruction Following

BenchmarkScorePositionSettingSourceDate
LMArena Instruction Following1457#37 of 298, top 13%LMArena2026-10-08

Long Context

BenchmarkScorePositionSettingSourceDate
LMArena Longer Query1462#40 of 291, top 14%LMArena2026-10-08

Writing & Preference

BenchmarkScorePositionSettingSourceDate
LMArena Text1479#18 of 297, top 7%LMArena2026-10-08
LMArena Creative Writing1437#42 of 295, top 15%LMArena2026-10-08
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1927#12 of 115, top 11%EQ-Bench
EQ-Bench 41260#8 of 28, top 29%EQ-Bench
LMArena Multi-Turn1485#14 of 295, top 5%LMArena2026-10-08

API pricing by provider

RouteInput $/MOutput $/MCached input $/MChecked
meta$1.25$4.25$0.152026-10-10
openrouter$1.25$4.25$0.152026-10-10

All Meta API prices → Estimate your cost →

Compare Muse Spark 1.1

Other Meta models

Frequently asked questions

How good is Muse Spark 1.1?

Muse Spark 1.1 by Meta ranks 51st of 354 ranked models on the Noometry Index as of October 2026, with a score of 49.9. Its strongest category is writing & preference, where it ranks 11th. API pricing starts at $1.25 per million input tokens and $4.25 per million output tokens, with a 1.05M-token context window.

How much does Muse Spark 1.1 cost?

Muse Spark 1.1 costs $1.25 per million input tokens and $4.25 per million output tokens on Meta's own API, with cached input at $0.15.

What is Muse Spark 1.1's context window?

Muse Spark 1.1 accepts up to 1.05M tokens of input and can write up to 131K tokens in one response.

Is Muse Spark 1.1 open source?

No. Muse Spark 1.1 is proprietary and available only through Meta's API and partner platforms.

What are Muse Spark 1.1's strengths and weaknesses?

Relative to other ranked models, Muse Spark 1.1 places best in writing & preference, multilingual, coding and lowest in agentic & tool use, math, multimodal.

What is Muse Spark 1.1 best at?

Its best category is writing & preference, where it ranks 11th on Noometry.