Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 vs GPT-5 Mini
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and GPT-5 Mini score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.9 vs 41.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher in 2 categories and GPT-5 Mini in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where GPT-5 Mini leads 76.2 to 69.4.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | GPT-5 Mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 41.9 | 41.8 |
| Released | — | 2025-08-07 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 400K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 60 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.2 (#145), GPT-5 Mini: 40.1 (#146)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | GPT-5 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1370 | 1406 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 64.7% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 59.8% |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | — | 39.7% |
| SciCode | — | 39.2% |
| WeirdML | — | 52.7% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 799.77 |
| AlgoTune | — | 1.38 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, GPT-5 Mini: 31.1 (#70)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | GPT-5 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 34.8% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 55.5% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | -31.18 |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 27.3 (#120), GPT-5 Mini: 23.9 (#168)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | GPT-5 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | 1380 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 4.4% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 70.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 54.3% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 30% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 8.2% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 10% |
| DTBench | — | 80.5% |
| LMCA | — | 34.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 145.52 |
| ForecastBench | — | 61 |
Math Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, GPT-5 Mini: 46.7 (#69)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | GPT-5 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 46.7% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 12.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| ProofBench | — | 9% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 72.2% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1378 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 97.8% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 27.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 6.3% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, GPT-5 Mini: 45.6 (#86)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | GPT-5 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 75% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 19.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 21.6% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 83.5% |
| Confabulations | — | 13.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 12.9% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 75.6% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1379 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, GPT-5 Mini: 35.6 (#85)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | GPT-5 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1202 |
| VPCT | — | 40.2% |
Multilingual GPT-5 Mini leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 47.3 (#150), GPT-5 Mini: 48.9 (#137)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | GPT-5 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1340 | 1363 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1341 | 1385 |
| LMArena French | — | 1386 |
| LMArena German | — | 1366 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1341 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1308 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1362 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1355 |
Instruction Following GPT-5 Mini leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 69.4 (#172), GPT-5 Mini: 76.2 (#46)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | GPT-5 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1315 | 1357 |
| IFEval | — | 92.7% |
Long Context GPT-5 Mini leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.5 (#152), GPT-5 Mini: 41.9 (#132)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | GPT-5 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1333 | 1355 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 69.4% |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 54.7 (#149), GPT-5 Mini: 55.2 (#148)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | GPT-5 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1364 | 1373 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1307 | 1325 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1355 | 1363 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 83.1% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1313 |
| WildBench | — | 85.5% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 better than GPT-5 Mini?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and GPT-5 Mini score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.9 vs 41.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 or GPT-5 Mini better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (40.2 vs 40.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and GPT-5 Mini share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 has 9 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5 Mini has 60.