Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 vs GPT-5.2 Codex

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 and GPT-5.2 Codex score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.8 vs 42.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.2 Codex OpenAI

42.6

Rank #111 Reported

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 and GPT-5.2 Codex specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10GPT-5.2 Codex
ProviderAmazonOpenAI
Noometry Index42.842.6
Released—2025-12-18
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—400K
Max output—128K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.75
Output $ / M tokens—$14
Results tracked135

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.2 Codex leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.7 (#96), GPT-5.2 Codex: 45.5 (#71)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10GPT-5.2 Codex
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—72.8%
LMArena WebDev—1339
SWE-bench Multilingual—66.3%
LMArena Coding1447—
ALE-Bench—1,300

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: —, GPT-5.2 Codex: 41.0 (#22)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10GPT-5.2 Codex
Terminal-Bench—66.5%

Reasoning Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 28.9 (#98), GPT-5.2 Codex: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10GPT-5.2 Codex
LMArena Hard Prompts1415—

Math Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 38.5 (#136), GPT-5.2 Codex: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10GPT-5.2 Codex
LMArena Math1404—

Knowledge Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 40.3 (#120), GPT-5.2 Codex: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10GPT-5.2 Codex
LMArena Expert1444—

Multilingual Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 50.2 (#126), GPT-5.2 Codex: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10GPT-5.2 Codex
LMArena Non-English1381—
LMArena Chinese1372—
LMArena Russian1391—
LMArena Spanish1390—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 72.9 (#126), GPT-5.2 Codex: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10GPT-5.2 Codex
LMArena Instruction Following1381—

Long Context Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.7 (#119), GPT-5.2 Codex: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10GPT-5.2 Codex
LMArena Longer Query1400—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 57.4 (#129), GPT-5.2 Codex: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10GPT-5.2 Codex
LMArena Text1396—
LMArena Creative Writing1331—
LMArena Multi-Turn1380—

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 better than GPT-5.2 Codex?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 and GPT-5.2 Codex score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.8 vs 42.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 or GPT-5.2 Codex better for coding?

GPT-5.2 Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks: 45.5 versus 42.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 and GPT-5.2 Codex share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 has 13 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.2 Codex has 5.

Related comparisons

Go deeper