Model comparison

DeepSeek-V3.1 vs GPT-5.2 Codex

DeepSeek-V3.1 and GPT-5.2 Codex score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.8 vs 42.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V3.1 DeepSeek

42.8

Rank #108 Confirmed

GPT-5.2 Codex OpenAI

42.6

Rank #111 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-5.2 Codex leads 45.5 to 40.3.
  • DeepSeek-V3.1 is cheaper at $0.25 / $0.95 per million input/output tokens, against $1.75 / $14 for GPT-5.2 Codex.
  • GPT-5.2 Codex accepts more context: 400K tokens versus 164K.
  • DeepSeek-V3.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V3.1 and GPT-5.2 Codex specifications
DeepSeek-V3.1GPT-5.2 Codex
ProviderDeepSeekOpenAI
Noometry Index42.842.6
Released2025-08-212025-12-18
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window164K400K
Max output8K128K
Input $ / M tokens$0.25$1.75
Output $ / M tokens$0.95$14
Results tracked275

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.2 Codex leads

DeepSeek-V3.1: 40.3 (#144), GPT-5.2 Codex: 45.5 (#71)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1GPT-5.2 Codex
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—72.8%
LMArena WebDev—1339
SWE-bench Multilingual—66.3%
WeirdML38.4%—
LMArena Coding1417—
ALE-Bench—1,300

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.1: —, GPT-5.2 Codex: 41.0 (#22)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1GPT-5.2 Codex
Terminal-Bench—66.5%

Reasoning Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.1: 27.9 (#110), GPT-5.2 Codex: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1GPT-5.2 Codex
SimpleBench40%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark53.2%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1417—
DTBench82.7%—
LMCA24.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index139.92—
ForecastBench58—

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.1: 38.9 (#122), GPT-5.2 Codex: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1GPT-5.2 Codex
LMArena Math1420—

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.1: 43.7 (#90), GPT-5.2 Codex: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1GPT-5.2 Codex
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.5%—
LMArena Expert1405—

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.1: 51.6 (#106), GPT-5.2 Codex: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1GPT-5.2 Codex
LMArena Non-English1400—
LMArena Chinese1469—
LMArena French1447—
LMArena German1411—
LMArena Japanese1378—
LMArena Korean1337—
LMArena Russian1405—
LMArena Spanish1431—

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.1: 73.9 (#110), GPT-5.2 Codex: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1GPT-5.2 Codex
LMArena Instruction Following1400—

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.1: 36.3 (#232), GPT-5.2 Codex: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1GPT-5.2 Codex
Fiction.LiveBench52.8%—
LMArena Longer Query1422—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.1: 60.3 (#98), GPT-5.2 Codex: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1GPT-5.2 Codex
LMArena Text1420—
LMArena Creative Writing1401—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1436—
LMArena Multi-Turn1408—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V3.1 better than GPT-5.2 Codex?

DeepSeek-V3.1 and GPT-5.2 Codex score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.8 vs 42.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-V3.1 or GPT-5.2 Codex?

DeepSeek-V3.1 is cheaper. It lists at $0.25 per million input tokens and $0.95 per million output tokens; GPT-5.2 Codex lists at $1.75 and $14.

Is DeepSeek-V3.1 or GPT-5.2 Codex better for coding?

GPT-5.2 Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks: 45.5 versus 40.3 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.2 Codex does, with 400K tokens against 164K.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.1 and GPT-5.2 Codex share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.1 has 27 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.2 Codex has 5.

Related comparisons

Go deeper