Model comparison

DeepSeek-V3.1 vs GPT-5.5 Instant

DeepSeek-V3.1 and GPT-5.5 Instant score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.8 vs 42.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V3.1 DeepSeek

42.8

Rank #108 Confirmed

GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI

42.7

Rank #110 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V3.1 scores higher in 2 categories and GPT-5.5 Instant in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where DeepSeek-V3.1 leads 38.9 to 26.5.
  • DeepSeek-V3.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V3.1 and GPT-5.5 Instant specifications
DeepSeek-V3.1GPT-5.5 Instant
ProviderDeepSeekOpenAI
Noometry Index42.842.7
Released2025-08-212026-05-05
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window164K—
Max output8K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.25—
Output $ / M tokens$0.95—
Results tracked2727

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.5 Instant leads

DeepSeek-V3.1: 40.3 (#144), GPT-5.5 Instant: 44.3 (#74)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1GPT-5.5 Instant
LMArena Coding14171433
SciCode—48.6%
WeirdML38.4%—

Reasoning DeepSeek-V3.1 leads

DeepSeek-V3.1: 27.9 (#110), GPT-5.5 Instant: 24.9 (#155)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1GPT-5.5 Instant
LMArena Hard Prompts14171426
Epoch Capabilities Index139.92142.52
SimpleBench40%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark53.2%—
CritPt—0%
Chess Puzzles—12%
DTBench82.7%—
LMCA24.3%—
ForecastBench58—

Math DeepSeek-V3.1 leads

DeepSeek-V3.1: 38.9 (#122), GPT-5.5 Instant: 26.5 (#259)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1GPT-5.5 Instant
LMArena Math14201420
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—26.3%
FrontierMath Tier 4—2.4%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—68.1%

Knowledge GPT-5.5 Instant leads

DeepSeek-V3.1: 43.7 (#90), GPT-5.5 Instant: 48.9 (#74)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1GPT-5.5 Instant
LMArena Expert14051409
GPQA Diamond—82.5%
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.5%—

Multimodal Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.1: —, GPT-5.5 Instant: 40.0 (#52)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1GPT-5.5 Instant
LMArena Vision—1250
LMArena Document—1403

Multilingual GPT-5.5 Instant leads

DeepSeek-V3.1: 51.6 (#106), GPT-5.5 Instant: 52.8 (#80)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1GPT-5.5 Instant
LMArena Non-English14001417
LMArena Chinese14691456
LMArena French14471428
LMArena German14111411
LMArena Japanese13781408
LMArena Korean13371392
LMArena Russian14051431
LMArena Spanish14311429

Instruction Following Too close to call

DeepSeek-V3.1: 73.9 (#110), GPT-5.5 Instant: 74.2 (#100)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1GPT-5.5 Instant
LMArena Instruction Following14001406

Long Context GPT-5.5 Instant leads

DeepSeek-V3.1: 36.3 (#232), GPT-5.5 Instant: 43.4 (#96)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1GPT-5.5 Instant
LMArena Longer Query14221422
Fiction.LiveBench52.8%—

Writing & Preference GPT-5.5 Instant leads

DeepSeek-V3.1: 60.3 (#98), GPT-5.5 Instant: 61.8 (#85)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1GPT-5.5 Instant
LMArena Text14201419
LMArena Creative Writing14011419
LMArena Multi-Turn14081433
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1436—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V3.1 better than GPT-5.5 Instant?

DeepSeek-V3.1 and GPT-5.5 Instant score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.8 vs 42.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is DeepSeek-V3.1 or GPT-5.5 Instant better for coding?

GPT-5.5 Instant scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.3 versus 40.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.1 and GPT-5.5 Instant share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.1 has 27 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.5 Instant has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper