Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 vs DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.5 to 43.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 scores higher in 7 categories and DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads 30.1 to 26.4.
  • DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 and DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus
ProviderAmazonDeepSeek
Noometry Index44.543.1
Released—2025-09-22
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—164K
Max output—147K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.27
Output $ / M tokens—$1
Results tracked1216

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 43.9 (#82), DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 42.0 (#113)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus
LMArena Coding14831426
SciCode—40.6%
ALE-Bench—745.17

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 30.1 (#86), DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 26.4 (#133)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus
LMArena Hard Prompts14581426
Kagi LLM Benchmark—57.4%
CritPt—1.7%
DTBench—81.3%
LMCA—28.6%

Math Too close to call

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 39.3 (#109), DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 38.5 (#137)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus
LMArena Math14381402

Knowledge Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 42.3 (#97), DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus
LMArena Expert1506—

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 54.0 (#50), DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 52.1 (#92)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus
LMArena Non-English14341407
LMArena Russian14231436
LMArena Chinese1463—

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 75.2 (#69), DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 74.0 (#106)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus
LMArena Instruction Following14271404

Long Context Too close to call

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 44.0 (#77), DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 43.4 (#97)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus
LMArena Longer Query14411421

Writing & Preference Too close to call

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 61.8 (#84), DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 61.0 (#92)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus
LMArena Text14481419
LMArena Creative Writing13681403
LMArena Multi-Turn14421411

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 better than DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.5 to 43.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 or DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.9 versus 42.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 and DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper