Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 vs Hunyuan Vision 1.5
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.5 to 43.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 scores higher in 6 categories and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads 54.0 to 50.3.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 44.5 | 43.1 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 43.9 (#82), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1483 | 1418 |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 30.1 (#86), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1458 | 1416 |
Math Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 39.3 (#109), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1438 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 42.3 (#97), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1506 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: —, Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1180 |
Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 54.0 (#50), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1434 | 1382 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1463 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1423 | — |
Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 75.2 (#69), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1427 | 1397 |
Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 44.0 (#77), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1441 | 1404 |
Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 61.8 (#84), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1448 | 1405 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1368 | 1388 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1442 | 1422 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 better than Hunyuan Vision 1.5?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.5 to 43.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 or Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better for coding?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.9 versus 41.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9.