Model comparison

C4ai Aya Expanse 32b vs gpt-oss-20b

C4ai Aya Expanse 32b is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

C4ai Aya Expanse 32b Cohere

35.9

Rank #221 Confirmed

gpt-oss-20b OpenAI

32.5

Rank #255 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. C4ai Aya Expanse 32b scores higher in 3 categories and gpt-oss-20b in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where C4ai Aya Expanse 32b leads 42.2 to 35.5.
  • gpt-oss-20b accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

C4ai Aya Expanse 32b and gpt-oss-20b specifications
C4ai Aya Expanse 32bgpt-oss-20b
ProviderCohereOpenAI
Noometry Index35.932.5
Released2024-10-242025-08-05
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K131K
Max output4K16K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.018
Output $ / M tokens—$0.09
Results tracked1834

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding gpt-oss-20b leads

C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 34.8 (#231), gpt-oss-20b: 37.6 (#192)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkC4ai Aya Expanse 32bgpt-oss-20b
LMArena Coding11971306
SciCode—34.4%
WeirdML—40.9%
ALE-Bench—566.05

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: —, gpt-oss-20b: 9.3 (#154)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkC4ai Aya Expanse 32bgpt-oss-20b
Terminal-Bench—3.4%

Reasoning C4ai Aya Expanse 32b leads

C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 23.3 (#180), gpt-oss-20b: 19.3 (#261)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkC4ai Aya Expanse 32bgpt-oss-20b
LMArena Hard Prompts11931274
Kagi LLM Benchmark—53.2%
CritPt—1.4%
Chess Puzzles—4%
DTBench—68%
LMCA—14.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—137.82

Math gpt-oss-20b leads

C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 34.0 (#197), gpt-oss-20b: 39.4 (#103)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkC4ai Aya Expanse 32bgpt-oss-20b
LMArena Math12001317
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—65.3%
Omni-MATH—56.5%

Knowledge gpt-oss-20b leads

C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 33.2 (#206), gpt-oss-20b: 34.6 (#195)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkC4ai Aya Expanse 32bgpt-oss-20b
LMArena Expert11821258
GPQA Diamond—60.8%
MMLU-Pro—74%
Vectara Hallucination Rate10.9%—
GPQA (HELM)—59.4%

Multilingual gpt-oss-20b leads

C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 38.4 (#230), gpt-oss-20b: 42.2 (#197)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkC4ai Aya Expanse 32bgpt-oss-20b
LMArena Non-English12131268
LMArena Chinese12111314
LMArena German11991255
LMArena Japanese11631244
LMArena Korean11581236
LMArena Russian12271278
LMArena Spanish11931267
LMArena French1248—

Instruction Following Too close to call

C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 62.6 (#237), gpt-oss-20b: 61.8 (#240)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkC4ai Aya Expanse 32bgpt-oss-20b
LMArena Instruction Following11961236
IFEval—73.2%

Long Context Too close to call

C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 37.2 (#220), gpt-oss-20b: 37.9 (#209)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkC4ai Aya Expanse 32bgpt-oss-20b
LMArena Longer Query12281250

Writing & Preference C4ai Aya Expanse 32b leads

C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 42.2 (#235), gpt-oss-20b: 35.5 (#265)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkC4ai Aya Expanse 32bgpt-oss-20b
LMArena Text12241287
LMArena Creative Writing12001201
LMArena Multi-Turn11901268
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—666
WildBench—73.7%

Frequently asked questions

Is C4ai Aya Expanse 32b better than gpt-oss-20b?

C4ai Aya Expanse 32b is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is C4ai Aya Expanse 32b or gpt-oss-20b better for coding?

gpt-oss-20b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.6 versus 34.8 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

gpt-oss-20b does, with 131K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do C4ai Aya Expanse 32b and gpt-oss-20b share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. C4ai Aya Expanse 32b has 18 scored results on Noometry and gpt-oss-20b has 34.

Related comparisons

Go deeper