OpenAI, open weights
gpt-oss-20b
gpt-oss-20b by OpenAI ranks 255th of 354 ranked models on the Noometry Index as of October 2026, with a score of 32.5. Its strongest category is math, where it ranks 103rd. API pricing starts at $0.018 per million input tokens and $0.09 per million output tokens, with a 131K-token context window.
Last verified
Specifications
- Noometry rank
- #255 of 354
- Index score
- 32.5
- Evidence
- Confirmed 34 results
- Provider
- OpenAI
- Released
- August 5, 2025
- Weights
- Open weights
- Reasoning
- Yes
- Context window
- 131K
- Max output
- 16K
- Input price
- $0.018 / M
- Output price
- $0.09 / M
- Blended price
- $0.036 / M
- Output speed
- 96 tokens/s Kagi
- Value
- #1 of 219
- Knowledge cutoff
- Unknown
- Input
- text
- Hugging Face
- openai/gpt-oss-20b
Category scores
Each category score combines every public result we have in that category.
- Coding 37.6
- Agentic & Tool Use 9.3
- Reasoning 19.3
- Math 39.4
- Knowledge 34.6
- Multilingual 42.2
- Instruction Following 61.8
- Long Context 37.9
- Writing & Preference 35.5
| Category | Score | Rank | Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 37.6 | #192 | 3 |
| Agentic & Tool Use | 9.3 | #154 | 1 |
| Reasoning | 19.3 | #261 | 6 |
| Math | 39.4 | #103 | 3 |
| Knowledge | 34.6 | #195 | 4 |
| Multilingual | 42.2 | #197 | 1 |
| Instruction Following | 61.8 | #240 | 2 |
| Long Context | 37.9 | #209 | 1 |
| Writing & Preference | 35.5 | #265 | 5 |
Strengths and weaknesses
Categories where gpt-oss-20b places highest and lowest among the models ranked in each, with its score against that category's median.
Strongest categories
Weakest categories
| Category | Score | vs median | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic & Tool Use | 9.3 | −21.0 | #154 of 154, top 100% |
| Writing & Preference | 35.5 | −18.2 | #265 of 312, top 85% |
| Instruction Following | 61.8 | −9.5 | #240 of 305, top 79% |
Closest competitors
The models ranked just above and below gpt-oss-20b. When scores are this close, price and speed are often the better way to choose.
| Model | Rank | Score | Blended $/M | Speed | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B | #251 | 33.0 | — | — | Compare |
| DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B | #252 | 32.7 | — | — | Compare |
| Qwen1.5-14B | #253 | 32.7 | — | — | Compare |
| Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | #254 | 32.7 | — | — | Compare |
| Laguna M.1 | #256 | 32.5 | — | — | Compare |
| Command R+ | #257 | 32.4 | $4.38 | — | Compare |
| Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | #258 | 32.4 | — | — | Compare |
| Pixtral Large | #259 | 32.2 | $3 | — | Compare |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Benchmark results
Every published result we track, with its source. Bold rows are the ones used for ranking; where several exist we prefer independent runs over self-reported numbers.
Coding
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 34.4% | #101 of 121, top 84% | high | Epoch AI | |
| WeirdML | 40.9% | #75 of 119, top 64% | high | Epoch AI | |
| WeirdML | 36.8% | medium | Epoch AI | ||
| LMArena Coding | 1306 | #196 of 294, top 67% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| ALE-Bench | 566.05 | #83 of 105, top 80% | Epoch AI |
Agentic & Tool Use
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 3.4% | #41 of 41, top 100% | Epoch AI |
Reasoning
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 53.2% | #56 of 99, top 57% | Kagi LLM Benchmark | ||
| CritPt | 1.4% | #76 of 134, top 57% | high | Epoch AI | |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | high | Epoch AI | 2026-08-27 | |
| Chess Puzzles | 2% | low | Epoch AI | 2026-08-27 | |
| Chess Puzzles | 4% | #98 of 129, top 76% | medium | Epoch AI | 2026-08-27 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1274 | #202 of 297, top 69% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| DTBench | 68% | #97 of 151, top 65% | high | Epoch AI | |
| LMCA | 14.5% | #106 of 125, top 85% | high | Epoch AI | |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 137.82 | #116 of 213, top 55% | Epoch AI | 2025-08-05 |
Math
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 50.8% | high | Epoch AI | 2026-08-27 | |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 40.3% | low | Epoch AI | 2026-08-27 | |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 65.3% | #100 of 173, top 58% | medium | Epoch AI | 2026-08-27 |
| Omni-MATH | 56.5% | #11 of 57, top 20% | HELM Capabilities | ||
| LMArena Math | 1317 | #172 of 285, top 61% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 |
Knowledge
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 46% | high | Epoch AI | 2026-08-06 | |
| GPQA Diamond | 53.2% | low | Epoch AI | 2026-08-27 | |
| GPQA Diamond | 60.8% | #113 of 186, top 61% | medium | Epoch AI | 2026-08-27 |
| MMLU-Pro | 74% | #28 of 58, top 49% | HELM Capabilities | ||
| GPQA (HELM) | 59.4% | #25 of 57, top 44% | HELM Capabilities | ||
| LMArena Expert | 1258 | #191 of 273, top 70% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 |
Multilingual
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1268 | #197 of 297, top 67% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena Chinese | 1314 | #183 of 285, top 65% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena German | 1255 | #173 of 231, top 75% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena Japanese | 1244 | #142 of 211, top 68% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena Korean | 1236 | #149 of 213, top 70% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena Russian | 1278 | #192 of 283, top 68% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena Spanish | 1267 | #175 of 226, top 78% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 |
Instruction Following
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 73.2% | #53 of 57, top 93% | HELM Capabilities | ||
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1236 | #224 of 298, top 76% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 |
Long Context
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1250 | #222 of 291, top 77% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 |
Writing & Preference
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1287 | #200 of 297, top 68% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1201 | #232 of 295, top 79% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 666 | #112 of 115, top 98% | EQ-Bench | ||
| WildBench | 73.7% | #48 of 57, top 85% | HELM Capabilities | ||
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1268 | #212 of 295, top 72% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 |
API pricing by provider
| Route | Input $/M | Output $/M | Cached input $/M | Checked |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| bedrock | $0.07 | $0.30 | — | 2026-10-10 |
| deepinfra | $0.03 | $0.14 | — | 2026-10-10 |
| groq | $0.075 | $0.30 | $0.0375 | 2026-10-10 |
| openrouter | $0.018 | $0.09 | $0.009 | 2026-10-10 |
| vertex | $0.07 | $0.25 | $0.007 | 2026-10-10 |
Compare gpt-oss-20b
- gpt-oss-20b vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
- gpt-oss-20b vs Laguna M.1
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen1.5-14B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Command R+
- gpt-oss-20b vs DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Granite 3.1 8b Instruct
- gpt-oss-20b vs Claude Fable 5.1
- gpt-oss-20b vs Gemini 3.8 Flash
- gpt-oss-20b vs Kimi K3
- gpt-oss-20b vs Grok 4.6
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.8 Max
- gpt-oss-20b vs GLM-5.3
- gpt-oss-20b vs Muse Spark 1.3
- gpt-oss-20b vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
Other OpenAI models
- GPT-6 Astra70.8
- GPT-6.1 Sol65.6
- GPT-5.6 Sol65.0
- GPT-5.5 Pro64.3
- GPT-5.563.4
- GPT-6 Sol61.8
- GPT-5.459.4
- GPT-5.6 Terra59.2
Frequently asked questions
How good is gpt-oss-20b?
gpt-oss-20b by OpenAI ranks 255th of 354 ranked models on the Noometry Index as of October 2026, with a score of 32.5. Its strongest category is math, where it ranks 103rd. API pricing starts at $0.018 per million input tokens and $0.09 per million output tokens, with a 131K-token context window.
How much does gpt-oss-20b cost?
gpt-oss-20b costs $0.018 per million input tokens and $0.09 per million output tokens on openrouter, with cached input at $0.009.
What is gpt-oss-20b's context window?
gpt-oss-20b accepts up to 131K tokens of input and can write up to 16K tokens in one response.
Is gpt-oss-20b open source?
Yes. gpt-oss-20b's weights are downloadable from Hugging Face (openai/gpt-oss-20b); check the license for commercial terms.
How fast is gpt-oss-20b?
gpt-oss-20b generated about 96 output tokens per second in the Kagi LLM Benchmark's timed runs. Speed varies by provider, load and reasoning effort.
What are gpt-oss-20b's strengths and weaknesses?
Relative to other ranked models, gpt-oss-20b places best in math, coding, knowledge and lowest in agentic & tool use, writing & preference, instruction following.
What is gpt-oss-20b best at?
Its best category is math, where it ranks 103rd on Noometry.