Model comparison
gpt-oss-20b vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
gpt-oss-20b and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.5 vs 32.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. gpt-oss-20b scores higher in 6 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where gpt-oss-20b leads 34.6 to 19.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Omni-MATH: 56.5% for gpt-oss-20b and 16.1% for Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct.
Side by side
| gpt-oss-20b | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | 32.7 |
| Released | 2025-08-05 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 131K | — |
| Max output | 16K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.018 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.09 | — |
| Results tracked | 34 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding gpt-oss-20b leads
gpt-oss-20b: 37.6 (#192), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-20b | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1306 | 1210 |
| SciCode | 34.4% | — |
| WeirdML | 40.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 566.05 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
gpt-oss-20b: 9.3 (#154), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-20b | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 3.4% | — |
Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
gpt-oss-20b: 19.3 (#261), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-20b | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1274 | 1208 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 53.2% | — |
| CritPt | 1.4% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 4% | — |
| DTBench | 68% | — |
| LMCA | 14.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 137.82 | — |
Math gpt-oss-20b leads
gpt-oss-20b: 39.4 (#103), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-20b | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 56.5% | 16.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1317 | 1208 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 65.3% | — |
Knowledge gpt-oss-20b leads
gpt-oss-20b: 34.6 (#195), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-20b | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 74% | 41.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 59.4% | 28.7% |
| GPQA Diamond | 60.8% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1258 | — |
Multilingual gpt-oss-20b leads
gpt-oss-20b: 42.2 (#197), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-20b | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1268 | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1314 | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | 1278 | 1187 |
| LMArena German | 1255 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1244 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1236 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1267 | — |
Instruction Following Too close to call
gpt-oss-20b: 61.8 (#240), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-20b | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 73.2% | 78% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1236 | 1186 |
Long Context gpt-oss-20b leads
gpt-oss-20b: 37.9 (#209), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-20b | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1250 | 1194 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
gpt-oss-20b: 35.5 (#265), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-20b | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1287 | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1201 | 1199 |
| WildBench | 73.7% | 73.4% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1268 | 1221 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 666 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is gpt-oss-20b better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?
gpt-oss-20b and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.5 vs 32.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is gpt-oss-20b or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?
gpt-oss-20b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.6 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do gpt-oss-20b and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. gpt-oss-20b has 34 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.