Model comparison

Claude 2.1 vs Claude 3 Opus

Claude 3 Opus is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.3 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.

Claude 2.1 Anthropic

24.9

Rank #340 Reported

Claude 3 Opus Anthropic

29.3

Rank #300 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2.1 scores higher in 1 category and Claude 3 Opus in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Claude 3 Opus leads 24.5 to 15.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 33% for Claude 2.1 and 47.2% for Claude 3 Opus.

Side by side

Claude 2.1 and Claude 3 Opus specifications
Claude 2.1Claude 3 Opus
ProviderAnthropicAnthropic
Noometry Index24.929.3
Released2023-11-212024-02-29
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked746

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude 3 Opus leads

Claude 2.1: 25.8 (#322), Claude 3 Opus: 32.4 (#261)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Claude 3 Opus
WeirdML7.1%19.2%
BigCodeBench Instruct—45.5%
LiveBench Coding—38.6%
LMArena Coding—1264
BigCodeBench Complete—57.4%
HumanEval+—77.4%
MBPP+—73.3%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, Claude 3 Opus: 24.3 (#110)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Claude 3 Opus
Cybench—10%
METR Time Horizons—29.5%

Reasoning Claude 2.1 leads

Claude 2.1: 20.6 (#216), Claude 3 Opus: 14.2 (#318)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Claude 3 Opus
DTBench51%61.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index119.22126.91
ForecastBench54.258.4
SimpleBench—23.5%
Chess Puzzles—5%
EnigmaEval—0.8%
LiveBench Reasoning—40.6%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1246
LiveBench Data Analysis—57.9%
LMCA—17%
LiveBench—49.2%
WinoGrande—88.5%

Math Claude 3 Opus leads

Claude 2.1: 9.6 (#309), Claude 3 Opus: 13.9 (#293)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Claude 3 Opus
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.9%4.7%
LiveBench Math—43.6%
LMArena Math—1273
MATH Level 5—37.5%

Knowledge Claude 3 Opus leads

Claude 2.1: 15.5 (#287), Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#262)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Claude 3 Opus
GPQA Diamond33%47.2%
MMLU73.5%84.6%
SimpleQA Verified—12.6%
Confabulations—22.7%
LMArena Expert—1223

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, Claude 3 Opus: 26.6 (#112)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Claude 3 Opus
LMArena Vision—1023

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, Claude 3 Opus: 41.6 (#202)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Claude 3 Opus
LMArena Non-English—1258
LMArena Chinese—1248
LMArena French—1274
LMArena German—1258
LMArena Japanese—1204
LMArena Korean—1187
LMArena Russian—1280
LMArena Spanish—1246

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, Claude 3 Opus: 64.3 (#223)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Claude 3 Opus
LiveBench Instruction Following—63.9%
LMArena Instruction Following—1248

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#197)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Claude 3 Opus
LMArena Longer Query—1259

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, Claude 3 Opus: 47.4 (#208)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Claude 3 Opus
LMArena Text—1262
LMArena Creative Writing—1235
LMArena Multi-Turn—1275
LiveBench Language—50.4%

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 2.1 better than Claude 3 Opus?

Claude 3 Opus is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.3 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 2.1 or Claude 3 Opus better for coding?

Claude 3 Opus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.4 versus 25.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Claude 3 Opus share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Claude 3 Opus has 46.

Related comparisons

Go deeper