Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3 Opus vs DeepSeek LLM 67B

Claude 3 Opus is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.3 to 24.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Opus Anthropic

29.3

Rank #300 Confirmed

DeepSeek LLM 67B DeepSeek

24.8

Rank #341 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Opus scores higher in 7 categories and DeepSeek LLM 67B in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Claude 3 Opus leads 24.5 to 7.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 37.5% for Claude 3 Opus and 6.4% for DeepSeek LLM 67B.
  • DeepSeek LLM 67B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3 OpusDeepSeek LLM 67B
ProviderAnthropicDeepSeek
Noometry Index29.324.8
Released2024-02-292023-11-29
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked4615

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude 3 Opus leads

Claude 3 Opus: 32.4 (#261), DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.3 (#273)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusDeepSeek LLM 67B
LMArena Coding12641096
WeirdML19.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct45.5%—
LiveBench Coding38.6%—
BigCodeBench Complete57.4%—
HumanEval+77.4%—
MBPP+73.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 24.3 (#110), DeepSeek LLM 67B: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusDeepSeek LLM 67B
Cybench10%—
METR Time Horizons29.5%—

Reasoning DeepSeek LLM 67B leads

Claude 3 Opus: 14.2 (#318), DeepSeek LLM 67B: 15.9 (#300)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusDeepSeek LLM 67B
Chess Puzzles5%0%
LMArena Hard Prompts12461070
Epoch Capabilities Index126.91110.54
SimpleBench23.5%—
EnigmaEval0.8%—
LiveBench Reasoning40.6%—
DTBench61.6%—
LiveBench Data Analysis57.9%—
LMCA17%—
ForecastBench58.4—
LiveBench49.2%—
WinoGrande88.5%—

Math Claude 3 Opus leads

Claude 3 Opus: 13.9 (#293), DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.1 (#318)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusDeepSeek LLM 67B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.7%0.8%
LMArena Math12731108
MATH Level 537.5%6.4%
LiveBench Math43.6%—

Knowledge Claude 3 Opus leads

Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#262), DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.1 (#308)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusDeepSeek LLM 67B
GPQA Diamond47.2%24.6%
SimpleQA Verified12.6%—
Confabulations22.7%—
LMArena Expert1223—
MMLU84.6%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 26.6 (#112), DeepSeek LLM 67B: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusDeepSeek LLM 67B
LMArena Vision1023—

Multilingual Claude 3 Opus leads

Claude 3 Opus: 41.6 (#202), DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.5 (#262)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusDeepSeek LLM 67B
LMArena Non-English12581073
LMArena Chinese12481132
LMArena French1274—
LMArena German1258—
LMArena Japanese1204—
LMArena Korean1187—
LMArena Russian1280—
LMArena Spanish1246—

Instruction Following Claude 3 Opus leads

Claude 3 Opus: 64.3 (#223), DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.7 (#272)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusDeepSeek LLM 67B
LMArena Instruction Following12481079
LiveBench Instruction Following63.9%—

Long Context Claude 3 Opus leads

Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#197), DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#260)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusDeepSeek LLM 67B
LMArena Longer Query12591092

Writing & Preference Claude 3 Opus leads

Claude 3 Opus: 47.4 (#208), DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.8 (#277)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusDeepSeek LLM 67B
LMArena Text12621105
LMArena Creative Writing12351067
LMArena Multi-Turn12751082
LiveBench Language50.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Opus better than DeepSeek LLM 67B?

Claude 3 Opus is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.3 to 24.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Opus or DeepSeek LLM 67B better for coding?

Claude 3 Opus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.4 versus 31.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Opus and DeepSeek LLM 67B share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Opus has 46 scored results on Noometry and DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper