Model comparison

Claude 2.1 vs GPT-4

GPT-4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.1 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.

Claude 2.1 Anthropic

25.2

Rank #345 Reported

GPT-4 OpenAI

29.1

Rank #316 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2.1 scores higher in 1 category and GPT-4 in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-4 leads 31.6 to 26.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 51% for Claude 2.1 and 62.7% for GPT-4.

Side by side

Claude 2.1 and GPT-4 specifications
Claude 2.1GPT-4
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Noometry Index25.229.1
Released2023-11-212023-03-14
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—8K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$30
Output $ / M tokens—$60
Results tracked738

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-4 leads

Claude 2.1: 26.2 (#327), GPT-4: 31.6 (#283)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1GPT-4
WeirdML7.1%12.4%
BigCodeBench Instruct—46%
LMArena Coding—1254
BigCodeBench Complete—57.2%
HumanEval+—79.3%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, GPT-4: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1GPT-4
METR Time Horizons—36.1%

Reasoning Claude 2.1 leads

Claude 2.1: 21.4 (#221), GPT-4: 17.8 (#289)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1GPT-4
DTBench51%62.7%
Epoch Capabilities Index119.27125.89
ForecastBench54.257.8
Chess Puzzles—4%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1241
Mystery Game Puzzles—12%
LMCA—17.1%
BIG-Bench Hard—75.1%
HellaSwag—95.3%
WinoGrande—87.5%

Math Too close to call

Claude 2.1: 10.2 (#315), GPT-4: 10.8 (#309)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1GPT-4
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.9%1.1%
LMArena Math—1269
MATH Level 5—23%
GSM8K—92%

Knowledge GPT-4 leads

Claude 2.1: 15.4 (#292), GPT-4: 18.4 (#282)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1GPT-4
GPQA Diamond33%35.7%
MMLU73.5%86.4%
LMArena Expert—1211
TriviaQA—84.8%

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, GPT-4: 40.6 (#215)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1GPT-4
LMArena Non-English—1246
LMArena Chinese—1242
LMArena French—1283
LMArena German—1251
LMArena Japanese—1209
LMArena Korean—1184
LMArena Russian—1251
LMArena Spanish—1261

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, GPT-4: 65.3 (#222)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1GPT-4
LMArena Instruction Following—1241

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, GPT-4: 37.7 (#212)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1GPT-4
LMArena Longer Query—1244

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, GPT-4: 34.9 (#268)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1GPT-4
LMArena Text—1263
LMArena Creative Writing—1244
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—752
LMArena Multi-Turn—1257

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 2.1 better than GPT-4?

GPT-4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.1 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 2.1 or GPT-4 better for coding?

GPT-4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.6 versus 26.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and GPT-4 share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and GPT-4 has 38.

Related comparisons

Go deeper