Model comparison

Claude 2 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash

Gemini 3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.1 to 24.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Claude 2 Anthropic

24.7

Rank #342 Reported

Gemini 3.6 Flash Google

54.1

Rank #30 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2 scores higher in 0 categories and Gemini 3.6 Flash in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 3.6 Flash leads 67.8 to 17.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 2.5% for Claude 2 and 94.2% for Gemini 3.6 Flash.

Side by side

Claude 2 and Gemini 3.6 Flash specifications
Claude 2Gemini 3.6 Flash
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Noometry Index24.754.1
Released2023-07-112026-07-21
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.75
Output $ / M tokens—$3.75
Results tracked846

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Gemini 3.6 Flash: 49.6 (#45)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Gemini 3.6 Flash
DeepSWE—46.7%
FrontierCode—34.4%
LMArena WebDev—1536
SciCode—52.7%
WeirdML—56.1%
LMArena Coding—1492
ALE-Bench—715.52
HumanEval+61.6%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Gemini 3.6 Flash: 32.4 (#56)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Gemini 3.6 Flash
APEX-Agents—46.9%
GDP.pdf—14%

Reasoning Gemini 3.6 Flash leads

Claude 2: 20.8 (#213), Gemini 3.6 Flash: 58.9 (#20)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Gemini 3.6 Flash
DTBench51.9%95.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index120.08154.36
ARC-AGI-2—60.4%
NYT Connections (extended)—89%
ARC-AGI-1—91.2%
CritPt—10.6%
Chess Puzzles—43%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1486
Mystery Game Puzzles—30%
LMCA—44.9%

Math Gemini 3.6 Flash leads

Claude 2: 8.7 (#314), Gemini 3.6 Flash: 57.0 (#33)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Gemini 3.6 Flash
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.5%94.2%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—58.9%
FrontierMath Tier 4—22%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—70.8%
ProofBench—36%
LMArena Math—1504
MATH Level 511.7%—

Knowledge Gemini 3.6 Flash leads

Claude 2: 17.0 (#282), Gemini 3.6 Flash: 67.8 (#7)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Gemini 3.6 Flash
GPQA Diamond34.7%94.1%
SimpleQA Verified—66.2%
LMArena Expert—1489
MMLU78.5%—
TriviaQA87.5%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Gemini 3.6 Flash: 38.7 (#55)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Vision—1297
Blueprint-Bench 2—31.2%
Furniture Assembly—23.3%
LMArena Document—1456

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Gemini 3.6 Flash: 56.8 (#17)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Non-English—1470
LMArena Chinese—1530
LMArena French—1501
LMArena German—1478
LMArena Japanese—1477
LMArena Korean—1435
LMArena Russian—1490
LMArena Spanish—1477

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Gemini 3.6 Flash: 77.2 (#27)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following—1467

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Gemini 3.6 Flash: 45.1 (#47)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Longer Query—1475

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Gemini 3.6 Flash: 68.3 (#26)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text—1478
LMArena Creative Writing—1464
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1604
LMArena Multi-Turn—1481

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 2 better than Gemini 3.6 Flash?

Gemini 3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.1 to 24.7 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and Gemini 3.6 Flash share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 3.6 Flash has 46.

Related comparisons

Go deeper