Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 2 vs GPT-5.6 Terra

GPT-5.6 Terra is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.2 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Claude 2 Anthropic

25.0

Rank #346 Reported

GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI

59.2

Rank #17 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2 scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-5.6 Terra in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.6 Terra leads 81.6 to 9.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 2.5% for Claude 2 and 99.7% for GPT-5.6 Terra.

Side by side

Claude 2GPT-5.6 Terra
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Noometry Index25.059.2
Released2023-07-112026-07-09
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—128K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$12
Results tracked852

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude 2: —, GPT-5.6 Terra: 57.7 (#19)

BenchmarkClaude 2GPT-5.6 Terra
DeepSWE—69.6%
FrontierCode—41.3%
CursorBench—41.3%
LMArena WebDev—1522
SciCode—55%
WeirdML—78.3%
LMArena Coding—1484
ALE-Bench—1,951
HumanEval+61.6%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 2: —, GPT-5.6 Terra: 40.1 (#25)

BenchmarkClaude 2GPT-5.6 Terra
APEX-Agents—58.2%
BALROG—53.2%
GDP.pdf—24.7%
Vending-Bench 2—7,343

Reasoning GPT-5.6 Terra leads

Claude 2: 21.7 (#216), GPT-5.6 Terra: 60.7 (#21)

BenchmarkClaude 2GPT-5.6 Terra
DTBench51.9%93.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index120.13159.62
ARC-AGI-2—83.9%
SimpleBench—48.9%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—51.3%
NYT Connections (extended)—78.4%
ARC-AGI-1—96.5%
CritPt—30%
Chess Puzzles—54%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1468
Mystery Game Puzzles—35%
LMCA—55%
Surface Evolver Bench—83.8%

Math GPT-5.6 Terra leads

Claude 2: 9.3 (#320), GPT-5.6 Terra: 81.6 (#12)

BenchmarkClaude 2GPT-5.6 Terra
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.5%99.7%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—86%
FrontierMath Tier 4—70.7%
ProofBench—74%
LMArena Math—1466
MATH Level 511.7%—

Knowledge GPT-5.6 Terra leads

Claude 2: 16.9 (#287), GPT-5.6 Terra: 61.2 (#30)

BenchmarkClaude 2GPT-5.6 Terra
GPQA Diamond34.7%93.3%
SimpleQA Verified—43.2%
LMArena Expert—1492
MMLU78.5%—
TriviaQA87.5%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 2: —, GPT-5.6 Terra: 47.3 (#11)

BenchmarkClaude 2GPT-5.6 Terra
LMArena Vision—1271
Blueprint-Bench 2—30.8%
Furniture Assembly—54.2%
LMArena Document—1472

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 2: —, GPT-5.6 Terra: 54.4 (#44)

BenchmarkClaude 2GPT-5.6 Terra
LMArena Non-English—1439
LMArena Chinese—1513
LMArena French—1471
LMArena German—1460
LMArena Japanese—1457
LMArena Korean—1425
LMArena Russian—1450
LMArena Spanish—1448

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 2: —, GPT-5.6 Terra: 76.4 (#40)

BenchmarkClaude 2GPT-5.6 Terra
LMArena Instruction Following—1454

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 2: —, GPT-5.6 Terra: 44.4 (#68)

BenchmarkClaude 2GPT-5.6 Terra
LMArena Longer Query—1451

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 2: —, GPT-5.6 Terra: 70.2 (#23)

BenchmarkClaude 2GPT-5.6 Terra
LMArena Text—1447
LMArena Creative Writing—1410
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1855
EQ-Bench 4—1234
LMArena Multi-Turn—1449

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 2 better than GPT-5.6 Terra?

GPT-5.6 Terra is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.2 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and GPT-5.6 Terra share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.6 Terra has 52.

Related comparisons

Go deeper