Model comparison

Claude 2 vs Kimi K3

Kimi K3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Claude 2 Anthropic

25.0

Rank #346 Reported

Kimi K3 Moonshot AI

59.5

Rank #15 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2 scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K3 in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K3 leads 74.2 to 9.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 2.5% for Claude 2 and 97.2% for Kimi K3.
  • Kimi K3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 2 and Kimi K3 specifications
Claude 2Kimi K3
ProviderAnthropicMoonshot AI
Noometry Index25.059.5
Released2023-07-112026-07-16
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—1.05M
Input $ / M tokens—$3
Output $ / M tokens—$15
Results tracked853

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Kimi K3: 61.0 (#10)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Kimi K3
DeepSWE—68.5%
FrontierCode—44.2%
LMArena WebDev—1654
FrontierSWE—25.9%
SciCode—59.5%
WeirdML—82.6%
LMArena Coding—1508
ALE-Bench—1,524
HumanEval+61.6%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Kimi K3: 41.8 (#20)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Kimi K3
APEX-Agents—50.6%
τ²-bench Banking—37.1%
PostTrainBench—32%
GBAEval—48.3%
GDP.pdf—19%
Vending-Bench 2—5,165

Reasoning Kimi K3 leads

Claude 2: 21.7 (#216), Kimi K3: 63.0 (#17)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Kimi K3
DTBench51.9%91.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index120.13157.45
ARC-AGI-2—60.4%
SimpleBench—60.7%
NYT Connections (extended)—93.6%
ARC-AGI-1—94.5%
CritPt—23.4%
Chess Puzzles—39%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1496
Mystery Game Puzzles—26%
LMCA—52.7%
Surface Evolver Bench—95%
ForecastBench—61.1

Math Kimi K3 leads

Claude 2: 9.3 (#320), Kimi K3: 74.2 (#16)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Kimi K3
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.5%97.2%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—72.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4—39%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—87.8%
ProofBench—87%
LMArena Math—1491
MATH Level 511.7%—

Knowledge Kimi K3 leads

Claude 2: 16.9 (#287), Kimi K3: 63.2 (#21)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Kimi K3
GPQA Diamond34.7%93.1%
SimpleQA Verified—50.6%
LMArena Expert—1521
MMLU78.5%—
TriviaQA87.5%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Kimi K3: 37.8 (#70)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Kimi K3
Blueprint-Bench 2—29.5%
Furniture Assembly—34.2%

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Kimi K3: 56.3 (#21)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Kimi K3
LMArena Non-English—1466
LMArena Chinese—1529
LMArena French—1491
LMArena German—1488
LMArena Japanese—1487
LMArena Korean—1458
LMArena Russian—1482
LMArena Spanish—1472

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Kimi K3: 77.7 (#14)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Kimi K3
LMArena Instruction Following—1483

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Kimi K3: 45.8 (#29)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Kimi K3
LMArena Longer Query—1494

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Kimi K3: 76.6 (#4)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Kimi K3
LMArena Text—1476
LMArena Creative Writing—1454
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—2082
EQ-Bench 4—1339
LMArena Multi-Turn—1488

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 2 better than Kimi K3?

Kimi K3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and Kimi K3 share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K3 has 53.

Related comparisons

Go deeper