Model comparison

Kimi K3 vs Llama 3-8B

Kimi K3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 23 shared benchmarks.

Kimi K3 Moonshot AI

59.5

Rank #15 Confirmed

Llama 3-8B Meta

25.5

Rank #344 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 23 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K3 scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 3-8B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K3 leads 74.2 to 8.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 97.2% for Kimi K3 and 1.9% for Llama 3-8B.

Side by side

Kimi K3 and Llama 3-8B specifications
Kimi K3Llama 3-8B
ProviderMoonshot AIMeta
Noometry Index59.525.5
Released2026-07-162024-04-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output1.05M—
Input $ / M tokens$3—
Output $ / M tokens$15—
Results tracked5334

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K3 leads

Kimi K3: 61.0 (#10), Llama 3-8B: 31.0 (#289)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Llama 3-8B
LMArena Coding15081152
DeepSWE68.5%—
FrontierCode44.2%—
LMArena WebDev1654—
FrontierSWE25.9%—
SciCode59.5%—
WeirdML82.6%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—31.9%
BigCodeBench Complete—36.9%
ALE-Bench1,524—
HumanEval+—56.7%
MBPP+—54.8%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Kimi K3: 41.8 (#20), Llama 3-8B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Llama 3-8B
APEX-Agents50.6%—
τ²-bench Banking37.1%—
PostTrainBench32%—
GBAEval48.3%—
GDP.pdf19%—
Vending-Bench 25,165—

Reasoning Kimi K3 leads

Kimi K3: 63.0 (#17), Llama 3-8B: 14.3 (#326)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Llama 3-8B
Chess Puzzles39%0%
LMArena Hard Prompts14961133
DTBench91.2%43.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index157.45116.45
ForecastBench61.158.6
ARC-AGI-260.4%—
SimpleBench60.7%—
NYT Connections (extended)93.6%—
ARC-AGI-194.5%—
CritPt23.4%—
Mystery Game Puzzles26%—
LMCA52.7%—
Surface Evolver Bench95%—
Adversarial NLI—57.3%
WinoGrande—75.7%

Math Kimi K3 leads

Kimi K3: 74.2 (#16), Llama 3-8B: 8.8 (#323)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Llama 3-8B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.2%1.9%
LMArena Math14911151
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)72.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 439%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions87.8%—
ProofBench87%—
MATH Level 5—6.1%

Knowledge Kimi K3 leads

Kimi K3: 63.2 (#21), Llama 3-8B: 7.8 (#308)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Llama 3-8B
GPQA Diamond93.1%26.1%
LMArena Expert15211113
SimpleQA Verified50.6%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—82.8%
MMLU—68.8%
OpenBookQA—82.6%
TriviaQA—67.7%

Multimodal Not comparable

Kimi K3: 37.8 (#70), Llama 3-8B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Llama 3-8B
Blueprint-Bench 229.5%—
Furniture Assembly34.2%—

Multilingual Kimi K3 leads

Kimi K3: 56.3 (#21), Llama 3-8B: 30.8 (#261)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Llama 3-8B
LMArena Non-English14661098
LMArena Chinese15291076
LMArena French14911159
LMArena German14881104
LMArena Japanese1487967
LMArena Korean14581004
LMArena Russian14821109
LMArena Spanish14721173

Instruction Following Kimi K3 leads

Kimi K3: 77.7 (#14), Llama 3-8B: 58.4 (#260)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Llama 3-8B
LMArena Instruction Following14831127

Long Context Kimi K3 leads

Kimi K3: 45.8 (#29), Llama 3-8B: 34.2 (#251)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Llama 3-8B
LMArena Longer Query14941128

Writing & Preference Kimi K3 leads

Kimi K3: 76.6 (#4), Llama 3-8B: 37.5 (#256)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Llama 3-8B
LMArena Text14761166
LMArena Creative Writing14541150
LMArena Multi-Turn14881152
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2082—
EQ-Bench 41339—

Frequently asked questions

Is Kimi K3 better than Llama 3-8B?

Kimi K3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Kimi K3 or Llama 3-8B better for coding?

Kimi K3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 61.0 versus 31.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Kimi K3 and Llama 3-8B share?

23 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K3 has 53 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-8B has 34.

Related comparisons

Go deeper