Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Wizardlm 70b

Wizardlm 70b is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3.5 Haiku Anthropic

29.2

Rank #315 Confirmed

Wizardlm 70b Microsoft

33.0

Rank #249 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.5 Haiku scores higher in 5 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Wizardlm 70b leads 32.2 to 14.7.
  • Wizardlm 70b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3.5 HaikuWizardlm 70b
ProviderAnthropicMicrosoft
Noometry Index29.233.0
Released2024-10-22—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked4912

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude 3.5 Haiku leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 32.9 (#265), Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuWizardlm 70b
LMArena Coding12861081
Aider Polyglot28%—
SciCode27.4%—
WeirdML30.7%—
BigCodeBench Instruct46.1%—
LiveBench Coding51.4%—
BigCodeBench Complete59%—
CadEval32%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 28.0 (#95), Wizardlm 70b: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuWizardlm 70b
BALROG19.3%—

Reasoning Wizardlm 70b leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 17.7 (#290), Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuWizardlm 70b
LMArena Hard Prompts12511079
CritPt0%—
LiveBench Reasoning28.1%—
DTBench56.7%—
LiveBench Data Analysis48.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index127.15—
LiveBench43.5%—

Math Wizardlm 70b leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 14.7 (#300), Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuWizardlm 70b
LMArena Math12441116
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.3%—
Omni-MATH22.4%—
LiveBench Math35.5%—
MATH Level 546.4%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.3%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 18.7 (#281), Wizardlm 70b: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuWizardlm 70b
GPQA Diamond38.1%—
MMLU-Pro60.5%—
Confabulations36.7%—
GPQA (HELM)36.3%—
LMArena Expert1208—
MMLU74.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 26.8 (#117), Wizardlm 70b: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuWizardlm 70b
LMArena Vision1092—
GeoBench34%—

Multilingual Claude 3.5 Haiku leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 40.0 (#218), Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuWizardlm 70b
LMArena Non-English12381078
LMArena Chinese12291052
LMArena German12371083
LMArena Russian12531155
LMArena French1264—
LMArena Japanese1175—
LMArena Korean1173—
LMArena Spanish1261—

Instruction Following Claude 3.5 Haiku leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 62.9 (#234), Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuWizardlm 70b
LMArena Instruction Following12411093
LiveBench Instruction Following61.9%—
IFEval79.2%—

Long Context Claude 3.5 Haiku leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 38.3 (#200), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuWizardlm 70b
LMArena Longer Query12611097

Writing & Preference Claude 3.5 Haiku leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 42.7 (#234), Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuWizardlm 70b
LMArena Text12551120
LMArena Creative Writing12331149
LMArena Multi-Turn12651108
Short-Story Creative Writing73.5%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1146—
WildBench76%—
LiveBench Language35.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku better than Wizardlm 70b?

Wizardlm 70b is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?

Claude 3.5 Haiku scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.9 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Haiku and Wizardlm 70b share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Haiku has 49 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper