Model comparison

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct vs Wizardlm 70b

Wizardlm 70b is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct Microsoft

28.8

Rank #310 Confirmed

Wizardlm 70b Microsoft

32.4

Rank #245 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Wizardlm 70b leads 19.8 to 14.2.

Side by side

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct and Wizardlm 70b specifications
Phi 3 Small 8k InstructWizardlm 70b
ProviderMicrosoftMicrosoft
Noometry Index28.832.4
Released2024-04-23—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3212

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Wizardlm 70b leads

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.4 (#313), Wizardlm 70b: 30.9 (#280)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructWizardlm 70b
LMArena Coding11021081
LiveBench Coding20.3%—

Reasoning Wizardlm 70b leads

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 14.2 (#319), Wizardlm 70b: 19.8 (#231)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructWizardlm 70b
LMArena Hard Prompts11001079
LiveBench Reasoning15.9%—
LiveBench Data Analysis30.3%—
Adversarial NLI58.1%—
BIG-Bench Hard79.1%—
HellaSwag77%—
LiveBench24%—
WinoGrande81.5%—

Math Wizardlm 70b leads

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 25.4 (#247), Wizardlm 70b: 29.7 (#216)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructWizardlm 70b
LMArena Math11511116
LiveBench Math17.6%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.5 (#237), Wizardlm 70b: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructWizardlm 70b
LMArena Expert1067—
ARC (AI2) Challenge90.7%—
MMLU75.7%—
OpenBookQA88%—
TriviaQA58.1%—

Multilingual Wizardlm 70b leads

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.6 (#267), Wizardlm 70b: 29.8 (#260)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructWizardlm 70b
LMArena Non-English10581078
LMArena Chinese10611052
LMArena German10801083
LMArena Russian11111155
LMArena French1134—
LMArena Japanese966—
LMArena Korean894—
LMArena Spanish1111—

Instruction Following Wizardlm 70b leads

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 52.2 (#287), Wizardlm 70b: 56.5 (#268)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructWizardlm 70b
LMArena Instruction Following10871093
LiveBench Instruction Following47.2%—

Long Context Too close to call

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 33.0 (#262), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#258)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructWizardlm 70b
LMArena Longer Query10881097

Writing & Preference Wizardlm 70b leads

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 31.3 (#279), Wizardlm 70b: 34.9 (#264)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructWizardlm 70b
LMArena Text11101120
LMArena Creative Writing10831149
LMArena Multi-Turn10681108
LiveBench Language12.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct better than Wizardlm 70b?

Wizardlm 70b is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?

Wizardlm 70b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.9 versus 27.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct and Wizardlm 70b share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has 32 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper