Model comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Gemma 3n E4b IT
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 34.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores higher in 5 categories and Gemma 3n E4b IT in 3 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 32.5 to 18.0.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemma 3n E4b IT | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Noometry Index | 34.4 | 36.7 |
| Released | 2024-06-20 | 2025-05-20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 33K |
| Max output | — | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.06 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.12 |
| Results tracked | 60 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 39.5 (#145), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 36.4 (#193)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1343 | 1269 |
| Aider Polyglot | 51.6% | — |
| GSO | 4.6% | — |
| WeirdML | 40% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 46.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 67.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 58.6% | — |
| CadEval | 48% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 81.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 74.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 32.1 (#61), Gemma 3n E4b IT: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 24% | — |
| Cybench | 17.5% | — |
| BALROG | 32.6% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 45.2% | — |
Reasoning Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 22.5 (#176), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.2 (#239)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1305 | 1284 |
| SimpleBench | 41.4% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 31.5% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.9% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 56.7% | — |
| DTBench | 67.8% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 55% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.55 | — |
| ForecastBench | 60.7 | — |
| LiveBench | 59% | — |
Math Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 18.0 (#282), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 32.5 (#186)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1306 | 1251 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 8.5% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 27.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 52.3% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 56.9% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 2.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |
Knowledge Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 28.5 (#236), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 33.6 (#193)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1264 | 1245 |
| GPQA Diamond | 55.3% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.1% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 77.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 19.9% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 56.5% | — |
| MMLU | 87.3% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 26.0 (#115), Gemma 3n E4b IT: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1125 | — |
| Video-MME | 60% | — |
| GeoBench | 62% | — |
| VPCT | 33% | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 43.4 (#180), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.5 (#179)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1283 | 1285 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1271 | 1310 |
| LMArena French | 1304 | 1330 |
| LMArena German | 1297 | 1312 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1234 | 1274 |
| LMArena Korean | 1200 | 1259 |
| LMArena Russian | 1305 | 1288 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1289 | 1305 |
Instruction Following Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 69.0 (#177), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.3 (#205)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1297 | 1255 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 69.3% | — |
| IFEval | 85.5% | — |
Long Context Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 39.9 (#162), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.8 (#185)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1311 | 1277 |
Writing & Preference Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 53.0 (#159), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.3 (#181)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1298 | 1306 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1292 | 1287 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1326 | 1276 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 80.3% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1451 | — |
| WildBench | 79.2% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 53.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet better than Gemma 3n E4b IT?
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 34.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Gemma 3n E4b IT better for coding?
Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Gemma 3n E4b IT share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Sonnet has 60 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18.