Model comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Hunyuan Turbo 0110
Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.5 vs 39.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores higher in 6 categories and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads 50.3 to 39.8.
Side by side
| Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 39.5 | 39.6 |
| Released | 2025-02-24 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 58 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 40.6 (#136), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.6 (#171)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1361 | 1319 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 61% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 52.8% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 64.9% | — |
| GSO | 3.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 74.5% | — |
| CadEval | 54% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 34.1 (#50), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 30.9% | — |
| Cybench | 20% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 43.6% | — |
| OSWorld | 35.8% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 60% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 18.6 (#277), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 26.1 (#137)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1333 | 1308 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.9% | — |
| SimpleBench | 46.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 28.6% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 4.2% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 87.8% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 74% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.16 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.8 | — |
| LiveBench | 76.1% | — |
Math Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 37.5 (#153), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 35.6 (#180)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1337 | 1273 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 33% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 79% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 91.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 4.1% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 39.8 (#130), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 79.7% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 78.4% | — |
| Confabulations | 14.7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 60.8% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1321 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 33.7 (#95), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1169 | — |
| GeoBench | 68% | — |
| VPCT | 39% | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 33.9% | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 44.1 (#179), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.3 (#184)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1296 | 1285 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1299 | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | 1311 | 1305 |
| LMArena French | 1303 | — |
| LMArena German | 1301 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1267 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1249 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1298 | — |
Instruction Following Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 72.9 (#125), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.4 (#195)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1352 | 1278 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 81.3% | — |
| IFEval | 83.4% | — |
Long Context Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 50.3 (#10), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#168)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1373 | 1309 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 83.3% | — |
Writing & Preference Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 54.4 (#150), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.2 (#183)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1314 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1332 | 1269 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1303 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 81.1% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1412 | — |
| WildBench | 81.4% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 59.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet better than Hunyuan Turbo 0110?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.5 vs 39.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet or Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better for coding?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.6 versus 38.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has 58 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11.