Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3 Haiku vs Codellama 70b Instruct

Codellama 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.3 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Haiku Anthropic

25.7

Rank #333 Confirmed

Codellama 70b Instruct Meta

33.3

Rank #236 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Haiku scores higher in 2 categories and Codellama 70b Instruct in 3 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where Claude 3 Haiku leads 36.1 to 24.9.
  • Codellama 70b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3 HaikuCodellama 70b Instruct
ProviderAnthropicMeta
Noometry Index25.733.3
Released2024-03-07—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked377

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Codellama 70b Instruct leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 26.1 (#320), Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.0 (#189)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuCodellama 70b Instruct
BigCodeBench Instruct39.4%40.7%
BigCodeBench Complete50.1%49.6%
HumanEval+68.9%65.9%
WeirdML9.8%—
LMArena Coding1199—
CadEval12%—
MBPP+68.8%—

Reasoning Codellama 70b Instruct leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 15.7 (#303), Codellama 70b Instruct: 19.2 (#241)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuCodellama 70b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts11741052
Kagi LLM Benchmark34.2%—
DTBench50.1%—
LMCA8.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index118.3—
ForecastBench53.2—
WinoGrande74.2%—

Math Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 9.2 (#313), Codellama 70b Instruct: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuCodellama 70b Instruct
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.8%—
LMArena Math1188—
MATH Level 514.9%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 17.3 (#280), Codellama 70b Instruct: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuCodellama 70b Instruct
GPQA Diamond36.3%—
Confabulations34.2%—
LMArena Expert1148—
MMLU73.8%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 23.1 (#123), Codellama 70b Instruct: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuCodellama 70b Instruct
LMArena Vision950—
ScienceQA72%—

Multilingual Claude 3 Haiku leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#238), Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.9 (#283)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuCodellama 70b Instruct
LMArena Non-English1178992
LMArena Chinese1155—
LMArena French1194—
LMArena German1174—
LMArena Japanese1102—
LMArena Korean1108—
LMArena Russian1204—
LMArena Spanish1165—

Instruction Following Claude 3 Haiku leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 61.5 (#242), Codellama 70b Instruct: 52.1 (#288)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuCodellama 70b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following11741024

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#232), Codellama 70b Instruct: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuCodellama 70b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1191—

Writing & Preference Codellama 70b Instruct leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 29.8 (#286), Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.6 (#272)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuCodellama 70b Instruct
LMArena Text11951057
LMArena Creative Writing1157—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing717—
LMArena Multi-Turn1190—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Haiku better than Codellama 70b Instruct?

Codellama 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.3 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Haiku or Codellama 70b Instruct better for coding?

Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 26.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Haiku and Codellama 70b Instruct share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Haiku has 37 scored results on Noometry and Codellama 70b Instruct has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper