Anthropic, proprietary
Claude 3 Haiku
Claude 3 Haiku by Anthropic ranks 340th of 354 ranked models on the Noometry Index as of October 2026, with a score of 25.9. Its strongest category is multimodal, where it ranks 128th.
Last verified
Specifications
- Noometry rank
- #340 of 354
- Index score
- 25.9
- Evidence
- Confirmed 37 results
- Provider
- Anthropic
- Released
- March 7, 2024
- Weights
- Proprietary
- Reasoning
- Unknown
- Context window
- —
- Max output
- —
- Input price
- Not listed
- Output price
- Not listed
- Blended price
- Not listed
- Output speed
- 41 tokens/s Kagi
- Value
- Not ranked
- Knowledge cutoff
- Unknown
Category scores
Each category score combines every public result we have in that category.
- Coding 26.4
- Reasoning 16.3
- Math 9.8
- Knowledge 17.3
- Multimodal 23.6
- Multilingual 36.0
- Instruction Following 61.3
- Long Context 36.1
- Writing & Preference 29.7
| Category | Score | Rank | Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 26.4 | #325 | 5 |
| Reasoning | 16.3 | #307 | 4 |
| Math | 9.8 | #319 | 3 |
| Knowledge | 17.3 | #285 | 3 |
| Multimodal | 23.6 | #128 | 1 |
| Multilingual | 36.0 | #243 | 1 |
| Instruction Following | 61.3 | #247 | 1 |
| Long Context | 36.1 | #237 | 1 |
| Writing & Preference | 29.7 | #291 | 4 |
Strengths and weaknesses
Categories where Claude 3 Haiku places highest and lowest among the models ranked in each, with its score against that category's median.
Strongest categories
| Category | Score | vs median | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Long Context | 36.1 | −4.9 | #237 of 296, top 81% |
| Instruction Following | 61.3 | −10.0 | #247 of 305, top 81% |
| Multilingual | 36.0 | −11.4 | #243 of 297, top 82% |
Weakest categories
| Category | Score | vs median | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Multimodal | 23.6 | −14.9 | #128 of 128, top 100% |
| Math | 9.8 | −26.7 | #319 of 327, top 98% |
| Coding | 26.4 | −12.3 | #325 of 340, top 96% |
Closest competitors
The models ranked just above and below Claude 3 Haiku. When scores are this close, price and speed are often the better way to choose.
| Model | Rank | Score | Blended $/M | Speed | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3-1.7B | #336 | 26.6 | — | — | Compare |
| Mistral Nemo | #337 | 26.4 | $0.15 | — | Compare |
| Ministral 3B | #338 | 26.2 | $0.10 | — | Compare |
| DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B | #339 | 26.1 | — | — | Compare |
| Gemma 2 9B | #341 | 25.9 | — | — | Compare |
| Dolly 2.0-12b | #342 | 25.5 | — | — | Compare |
| GPT-4o mini | #343 | 25.5 | $0.26 | 120 | Compare |
| Llama 3-8B | #344 | 25.5 | — | — | Compare |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Benchmark results
Every published result we track, with its source. Bold rows are the ones used for ranking; where several exist we prefer independent runs over self-reported numbers.
Coding
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 9.8% | #114 of 119, top 96% | Epoch AI | ||
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 39.4% | #34 of 64, top 54% | BigCodeBench | 2024-03-07 | |
| LMArena Coding | 1199 | #241 of 294, top 82% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 50.1% | #34 of 66, top 52% | BigCodeBench | 2024-03-07 | |
| CadEval | 12% | #14 of 14, top 100% | Epoch AI | ||
| HumanEval+ | 68.9% | #22 of 45, top 49% | mar 2024 | EvalPlus | |
| MBPP+ | 68.8% | #17 of 38, top 45% | mar 2024 | EvalPlus |
Reasoning
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 34.2% | #89 of 99, top 90% | Kagi LLM Benchmark | ||
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1174 | #247 of 297, top 84% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| DTBench | 50.1% | #136 of 151, top 91% | Epoch AI | ||
| LMCA | 8.8% | #115 of 125, top 92% | Epoch AI | ||
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.35 | #177 of 213, top 84% | Epoch AI | 2024-03-07 | |
| ForecastBench | 53.2 | #70 of 72, top 98% | Epoch AI | ||
| WinoGrande | 74.2% | #25 of 43, top 59% | Epoch AI |
Math
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.8% | #163 of 173, top 95% | Epoch AI | 2025-02-25 | |
| LMArena Math | 1188 | #235 of 285, top 83% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| MATH Level 5 | 14.9% | #68 of 79, top 87% | Epoch AI | 2025-01-27 |
Knowledge
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 36.3% | #156 of 186, top 84% | Epoch AI | 2025-01-27 | |
| Confabulations (lower is better) | 34.2% | #48 of 51, top 95% | Lech Mazur benchmarks | ||
| LMArena Expert | 1148 | #236 of 273, top 87% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| MMLU | 73.8% | #36 of 81, top 45% | Epoch AI |
Multimodal
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 950 | #122 of 122, top 100% | LMArena | 2026-10-09 | |
| ScienceQA | 72% | #3 of 6, top 50% | Epoch AI |
Multilingual
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1178 | #243 of 297, top 82% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena Chinese | 1155 | #245 of 285, top 86% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena French | 1195 | #194 of 223, top 87% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena German | 1174 | #198 of 231, top 86% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena Japanese | 1102 | #186 of 211, top 89% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena Korean | 1109 | #188 of 213, top 89% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena Russian | 1204 | #232 of 283, top 82% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena Spanish | 1166 | #202 of 226, top 90% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 |
Instruction Following
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1173 | #247 of 298, top 83% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 |
Long Context
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1190 | #246 of 291, top 85% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 |
Writing & Preference
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1195 | #244 of 297, top 83% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1157 | #248 of 295, top 85% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 717 | #108 of 115, top 94% | EQ-Bench | ||
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1190 | #241 of 295, top 82% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 |
Compare Claude 3 Haiku
- Claude 3 Haiku vs DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B
- Claude 3 Haiku vs Gemma 2 9B
- Claude 3 Haiku vs Ministral 3B
- Claude 3 Haiku vs Dolly 2.0-12b
- Claude 3 Haiku vs Mistral Nemo
- Claude 3 Haiku vs GPT-4o mini
- Claude 3 Haiku vs GPT-6 Astra
- Claude 3 Haiku vs Gemini 3.8 Flash
- Claude 3 Haiku vs Kimi K3
- Claude 3 Haiku vs Grok 4.6
- Claude 3 Haiku vs Qwen3.8 Max
- Claude 3 Haiku vs GLM-5.3
- Claude 3 Haiku vs Muse Spark 1.3
- Claude 3 Haiku vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
Other Anthropic models
- Claude Fable 5.169.0
- Claude Opus 5.568.6
- Claude Opus 567.8
- Claude Fable 566.8
- Claude Sonnet 5.561.9
- Claude Opus 4.860.7
- Claude Opus 4.758.3
- Claude Opus 4.658.2
Frequently asked questions
How good is Claude 3 Haiku?
Claude 3 Haiku by Anthropic ranks 340th of 354 ranked models on the Noometry Index as of October 2026, with a score of 25.9. Its strongest category is multimodal, where it ranks 128th.
Is Claude 3 Haiku open source?
No. Claude 3 Haiku is proprietary and available only through Anthropic's API and partner platforms.
How fast is Claude 3 Haiku?
Claude 3 Haiku generated about 41 output tokens per second in the Kagi LLM Benchmark's timed runs. Speed varies by provider, load and reasoning effort.
What are Claude 3 Haiku's strengths and weaknesses?
Relative to other ranked models, Claude 3 Haiku places best in long context, instruction following, multilingual and lowest in multimodal, math, coding.
What is Claude 3 Haiku best at?
Its best category is multimodal, where it ranks 128th on Noometry.