Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3 Haiku vs Grok 4.6

Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.9 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 24 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Haiku Anthropic

25.9

Rank #340 Confirmed

Grok 4.6 xAI

56.9

Rank #21 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 24 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Haiku scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.6 in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Grok 4.6 leads 67.0 to 9.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.8% for Claude 3 Haiku and 99.2% for Grok 4.6.

Side by side

Claude 3 HaikuGrok 4.6
ProviderAnthropicxAI
Noometry Index25.956.9
Released2024-03-072026-08-12
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—500K
Max output—500K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked3749

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.6 leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 26.4 (#325), Grok 4.6: 58.5 (#16)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGrok 4.6
WeirdML9.8%67.3%
LMArena Coding11991465
DeepSWE—67.5%
FrontierCode—48%
CursorBench—41.4%
LMArena WebDev—1617
FrontierSWE—25.3%
SciCode—56.5%
BigCodeBench Instruct39.4%—
BigCodeBench Complete50.1%—
CadEval12%—
ALE-Bench—1,508
HumanEval+68.9%—
MBPP+68.8%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: —, Grok 4.6: 39.4 (#27)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGrok 4.6
APEX-Agents—65.3%
GDP.pdf—17.2%
Vending-Bench 2—9,047

Reasoning Grok 4.6 leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 16.3 (#307), Grok 4.6: 61.4 (#20)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGrok 4.6
LMArena Hard Prompts11741447
DTBench50.1%97.3%
LMCA8.8%48.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index118.35156.44
ARC-AGI-2—67.1%
SimpleBench—75.9%
Kagi LLM Benchmark34.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)—80%
ARC-AGI-1—87.5%
CritPt—19.7%
Chess Puzzles—40%
EBR-Bench—30.5%
Mystery Game Puzzles—34%
ForecastBench53.2—
WinoGrande74.2%—

Math Grok 4.6 leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 9.8 (#319), Grok 4.6: 67.0 (#24)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGrok 4.6
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.8%99.2%
LMArena Math11881423
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—66%
FrontierMath Tier 4—31.7%
ProofBench—51%
MATH Level 514.9%—

Knowledge Grok 4.6 leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 17.3 (#285), Grok 4.6: 63.3 (#20)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGrok 4.6
GPQA Diamond36.3%94%
LMArena Expert11481467
SimpleQA Verified—49.3%
Confabulations34.2%—
MMLU73.8%—

Multimodal Grok 4.6 leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 23.6 (#128), Grok 4.6: 43.6 (#23)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGrok 4.6
LMArena Vision9501263
Blueprint-Bench 2—33.2%
Furniture Assembly—40%
LMArena Document—1452
ScienceQA72%—

Multilingual Grok 4.6 leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.0 (#243), Grok 4.6: 53.0 (#74)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGrok 4.6
LMArena Non-English11781420
LMArena Chinese11551480
LMArena French11951461
LMArena German11741431
LMArena Japanese11021376
LMArena Korean11091397
LMArena Russian12041422
LMArena Spanish11661404

Instruction Following Grok 4.6 leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 61.3 (#247), Grok 4.6: 75.4 (#63)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGrok 4.6
LMArena Instruction Following11731431

Long Context Grok 4.6 leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#237), Grok 4.6: 44.5 (#66)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGrok 4.6
LMArena Longer Query11901454

Writing & Preference Grok 4.6 leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 29.7 (#291), Grok 4.6: 62.3 (#80)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGrok 4.6
LMArena Text11951428
LMArena Creative Writing11571428
LMArena Multi-Turn11901425
EQ-Bench Creative Writing717—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Haiku better than Grok 4.6?

Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.9 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Haiku or Grok 4.6 better for coding?

Grok 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.5 versus 26.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Haiku and Grok 4.6 share?

24 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Haiku has 37 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.6 has 49.

Related comparisons

Go deeper