Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3 Haiku vs Command A

Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Haiku Anthropic

25.7

Rank #333 Confirmed

Command A Cohere

35.9

Rank #212 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Haiku scores higher in 0 categories and Command A in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Command A leads 33.5 to 9.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 50.1% for Claude 3 Haiku and 61.3% for Command A.
  • Command A has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3 HaikuCommand A
ProviderAnthropicCohere
Noometry Index25.735.9
Released2024-03-072025-03-13
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—256K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$2.50
Output $ / M tokens—$10
Results tracked3724

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Claude 3 Haiku: 26.1 (#320), Command A: 26.8 (#317)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuCommand A
LMArena Coding11991331
Aider Polyglot—12%
WeirdML9.8%—
BigCodeBench Instruct39.4%—
BigCodeBench Complete50.1%—
CadEval12%—
HumanEval+68.9%—
MBPP+68.8%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: —, Command A: 35.7 (#36)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuCommand A
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—57.1%

Reasoning Command A leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 15.7 (#303), Command A: 17.7 (#276)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuCommand A
Kagi LLM Benchmark34.2%28.8%
LMArena Hard Prompts11741326
DTBench50.1%61.3%
LMCA8.8%10.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index118.3—
ForecastBench53.2—
WinoGrande74.2%—

Math Command A leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 9.2 (#313), Command A: 33.5 (#172)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuCommand A
LMArena Math11881300
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.8%—
MATH Level 514.9%—

Knowledge Command A leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 17.3 (#280), Command A: 36.5 (#157)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuCommand A
LMArena Expert11481295
GPQA Diamond36.3%—
Confabulations34.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.3%
MMLU73.8%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 23.1 (#123), Command A: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuCommand A
LMArena Vision950—
ScienceQA72%—

Multilingual Command A leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#238), Command A: 45.5 (#166)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuCommand A
LMArena Non-English11781313
LMArena Chinese11551327
LMArena French11941352
LMArena German11741341
LMArena Japanese11021283
LMArena Korean11081285
LMArena Russian12041314
LMArena Spanish11651346

Instruction Following Command A leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 61.5 (#242), Command A: 69.3 (#172)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuCommand A
LMArena Instruction Following11741309

Long Context Command A leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#232), Command A: 40.6 (#147)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuCommand A
LMArena Longer Query11911334

Writing & Preference Command A leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 29.8 (#286), Command A: 47.8 (#204)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuCommand A
LMArena Text11951331
LMArena Creative Writing11571319
EQ-Bench Creative Writing7171145
LMArena Multi-Turn11901338

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Haiku better than Command A?

Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Haiku or Command A better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (26.1 vs 26.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Haiku and Command A share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Haiku has 37 scored results on Noometry and Command A has 24.

Related comparisons

Go deeper