Model comparison
Claude 3 Haiku vs Qwen Turbo
Qwen Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 27.1 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Haiku scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen Turbo in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen Turbo leads 15.3 to 9.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 14.9% for Claude 3 Haiku and 56.2% for Qwen Turbo.
Side by side
| Claude 3 Haiku | Qwen Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 25.9 | 27.1 |
| Released | 2024-03-07 | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.20 |
| Results tracked | 37 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude 3 Haiku: 26.4 (#325), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 9.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 39.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1199 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 50.1% | — |
| CadEval | 12% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 68.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 68.8% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Claude 3 Haiku: 16.3 (#307), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 34.2% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1174 | — |
| DTBench | 50.1% | — |
| LMCA | 8.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.35 | — |
| ForecastBench | 53.2 | — |
| WinoGrande | 74.2% | — |
Math Qwen Turbo leads
Claude 3 Haiku: 9.8 (#319), Qwen Turbo: 15.3 (#297)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.8% | 6.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | 14.9% | 56.2% |
| LMArena Math | 1188 | — |
Knowledge Qwen Turbo leads
Claude 3 Haiku: 17.3 (#285), Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#272)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 36.3% | 41.8% |
| Confabulations | 34.2% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1148 | — |
| MMLU | 73.8% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 3 Haiku: 23.6 (#128), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 950 | — |
| ScienceQA | 72% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 3 Haiku: 36.0 (#243), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1178 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1155 | — |
| LMArena French | 1195 | — |
| LMArena German | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1102 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1109 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1204 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1166 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 3 Haiku: 61.3 (#247), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1173 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#237), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1190 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 3 Haiku: 29.7 (#291), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1195 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1157 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 717 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1190 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3 Haiku better than Qwen Turbo?
Qwen Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 27.1 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Haiku and Qwen Turbo share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Haiku has 37 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.