Model comparison
Claude 3 Opus vs Llama 13b
Claude 3 Opus is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.5 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Opus scores higher in 5 categories and Llama 13b in 1 category; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Claude 3 Opus leads 47.2 to 13.8.
- Llama 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 3 Opus | Llama 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 29.5 | 24.4 |
| Released | 2024-02-29 | 2023-02-24 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 46 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude 3 Opus leads
Claude 3 Opus: 32.9 (#267), Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1264 | 683 |
| WeirdML | 19.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.5% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 38.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.4% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 77.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 73.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude 3 Opus: 24.6 (#116), Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 10% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 29.5% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Claude 3 Opus: 14.6 (#324), Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1245 | 728 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 126.91 | 100.58 |
| WinoGrande | 88.5% | 73% |
| SimpleBench | 23.5% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 5% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 0.8% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 40.6% | — |
| DTBench | 61.6% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 57.9% | — |
| LMCA | 17% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 37.9% |
| ForecastBench | 58.4 | — |
| HellaSwag | — | 79.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 75.2% |
| LiveBench | 49.2% | — |
| PIQA | — | 80.1% |
Math Llama 13b leads
Claude 3 Opus: 14.8 (#299), Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1273 | 838 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.7% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 43.6% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 37.5% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 20.6% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#267), Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 84.6% | 47.7% |
| GPQA Diamond | 47.2% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 12.6% | — |
| Confabulations | 22.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 52.7% |
| BoolQ | — | 78.7% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 56.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 77.9% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 3 Opus: 27.1 (#116), Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1023 | — |
| ScienceQA | — | 43.3% |
Multilingual Claude 3 Opus leads
Claude 3 Opus: 41.4 (#207), Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1258 | 819 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1248 | — |
| LMArena French | 1275 | — |
| LMArena German | 1258 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1204 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1187 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1280 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1246 | — |
Instruction Following Claude 3 Opus leads
Claude 3 Opus: 64.1 (#228), Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1248 | 781 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 63.9% | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#202), Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1259 | — |
Writing & Preference Claude 3 Opus leads
Claude 3 Opus: 47.2 (#213), Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1262 | 834 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 794 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 753 |
| LiveBench Language | 50.4% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3 Opus better than Llama 13b?
Claude 3 Opus is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.5 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 3 Opus or Llama 13b better for coding?
Claude 3 Opus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.9 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Opus and Llama 13b share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Opus has 46 scored results on Noometry and Llama 13b has 21.