Model comparison
Claude Instant vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MiMo-V2.6-Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#55); Claude Instant does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 30.4 to 18.8.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude Instant | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 46.7 |
| Released | 2023-08-09 | 2026-09-22 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 7 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 53.2 (#27)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1618 |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1538 |
| HumanEval+ | 50.6% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Claude Instant: 18.8, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 30.4 (#76)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1511 |
| DTBench | 45.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.2 | — |
Math Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.9 (#91)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1497 |
| GSM8K | 86.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.0 (#85)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1548 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 86.3% | — |
| MMLU | 73.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 78.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.2 (#40)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1265 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 57.0 (#15)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1532 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1481 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#10)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1490 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#26)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1500 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.9 (#32)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1491 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1465 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1463 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Instant better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#55); Claude Instant does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Claude Instant and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Instant has 7 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 14.