Model comparison
Claude Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)
Claude Opus 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.2 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 31 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 31 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 4.6 scores higher in 10 categories and Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Claude Opus 4.6 leads 57.8 to 15.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is ARC-AGI-2: 69.2% for Claude Opus 4.6 and 1.3% for Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025).
Side by side
| Claude Opus 4.6 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Noometry Index | 58.2 | 35.1 |
| Released | 2026-02-04 | 2024-12-06 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $5 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $25 | — |
| Results tracked | 68 | 54 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Opus 4.6 leads
Claude Opus 4.6: 57.2 (#20), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.4 (#315)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.6 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 75.6% | 13.5% |
| WeirdML | 78% | 25.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1536 | 1350 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 78.7% | — |
| FrontierCode | 26.6% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 38.2% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1547 | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 72% | — |
| GSO | 41.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45.9% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 63.4% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 59.9% |
| CadEval | — | 30% |
| ALE-Bench | 996.5 | — |
| AlgoTune | 1.47 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Claude Opus 4.6 leads
Claude Opus 4.6: 51.1 (#4), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.1 (#92)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.6 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 79.8% | — |
| APEX-Agents | 46.3% | — |
| Remote Labor Index | 4.2% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | — | 11.4% |
| τ²-bench Banking | 27.3% | — |
| Cybench | 93% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 55.3% | — |
| GBAEval | 44.1% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1253 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 78.9% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 8,018 | — |
Reasoning Claude Opus 4.6 leads
Claude Opus 4.6: 57.8 (#23), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#318)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.6 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 69.2% | 1.3% |
| SimpleBench | 67.6% | 31.1% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 83.6% | 37.8% |
| EnigmaEval | 7.6% | 1.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1527 | 1346 |
| DTBench | 91.2% | 63.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.24 | 135.36 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 92.1% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 94% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 17% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 80.6% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 12.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 78.2% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 25% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 69.4% |
| LMCA | 55.8% | — |
| ForecastBench | 60 | — |
| LiveBench | — | 66.9% |
Math Claude Opus 4.6 leads
Claude Opus 4.6: 63.0 (#31), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 37.9 (#146)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.6 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 94.4% | 57.8% |
| LMArena Math | 1519 | 1352 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 40.7% | 1.7% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 66% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 26.8% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 78.5% | — |
| ProofBench | 50% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 45.9% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 75.8% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 82.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 22.9% | — |
Knowledge Claude Opus 4.6 leads
Claude Opus 4.6: 61.9 (#26), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#213)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.6 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 90.5% | 64.1% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 34.4% | 6.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1546 | 1339 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 47% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 73.7% |
| Confabulations | — | 12.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 12.2% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 55.6% |
| MMLU | — | 79.7% |
Multimodal Too close to call
Claude Opus 4.6: 37.3 (#74), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.5 (#79)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.6 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1316 | 1158 |
| GeoBench | — | 77% |
| Furniture Assembly | 28.3% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1507 | — |
Multilingual Claude Opus 4.6 leads
Claude Opus 4.6: 57.9 (#6), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.4 (#149)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.6 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1489 | 1342 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1551 | 1373 |
| LMArena French | 1513 | 1391 |
| LMArena German | 1502 | 1353 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1484 | 1294 |
| LMArena Korean | 1464 | 1313 |
| LMArena Russian | 1497 | 1351 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1510 | 1363 |
Instruction Following Claude Opus 4.6 leads
Claude Opus 4.6: 79.5 (#4), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.4 (#97)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.6 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1523 | 1336 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 85.8% |
| IFEval | — | 84.1% |
Long Context Claude Opus 4.6 leads
Claude Opus 4.6: 48.1 (#13), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#203)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.6 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1520 | 1344 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 61.1% |
| CL-bench | 20.7% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 17% | — |
Writing & Preference Claude Opus 4.6 leads
Claude Opus 4.6: 73.5 (#10), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.5 (#190)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.6 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1503 | 1354 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1505 | 1340 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1809 | 1128 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1513 | 1350 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 73.8% |
| WildBench | — | 80% |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1223 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 51.3% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Opus 4.6 better than Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)?
Claude Opus 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.2 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude Opus 4.6 or Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better for coding?
Claude Opus 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 57.2 versus 28.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 4.6 and Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) share?
31 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 4.6 has 68 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54.