Noometry

Model comparison

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)

Claude Opus 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.4 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 29 shared benchmarks.

Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic

58.4

Rank #17 Confirmed

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) Google

34.8

Rank #223 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 29 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 4.7 scores higher in 10 categories and Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) in 0 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Claude Opus 4.7 leads 53.7 to 15.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is ARC-AGI-2: 75.8% for Claude Opus 4.7 and 1.3% for Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025).

Side by side

Claude Opus 4.7Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Noometry Index58.434.8
Released2026-04-142024-12-06
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$5—
Output $ / M tokens$25—
Results tracked6654

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude Opus 4.7: 59.9 (#10), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.2 (#308)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)
WeirdML76.4%25.8%
LMArena Coding15191351
SWE-bench Verified83.5%—
FrontierCode38.5%—
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—13.5%
Aider Polyglot—38.2%
LMArena WebDev1557—
SciCode54.5%—
GSO44.1%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—45.9%
LiveBench Coding—63.4%
MirrorCode31.1%—
BigCodeBench Complete—59.9%
CadEval—30%
ALE-Bench1,323—

Agentic & Tool Use Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude Opus 4.7: 47.9 (#8), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.0 (#85)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)
Terminal-Bench80.2%—
APEX-Agents49.2%—
OSWorld 2.018.2%—
TheAgentCompany—11.4%
τ²-bench Banking40.2%—
PostTrainBench28.6%—
ExploitBench26.5%—
GBAEval43.8%—
GDP.pdf21%—
LMArena Search1233—
Vending-Bench 210,937—

Reasoning Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude Opus 4.7: 53.7 (#24), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#308)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)
ARC-AGI-275.8%1.3%
SimpleBench61.7%31.1%
Kagi LLM Benchmark80.7%37.8%
LMArena Hard Prompts15071346
DTBench94.7%63.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index156.39135.36
NYT Connections (extended)39%—
ARC-AGI-193.5%—
CritPt12%—
Chess Puzzles30%—
EnigmaEval—1.1%
Thematic Generalization72.8%—
EBR-Bench19%—
LiveBench Reasoning—78.2%
Mystery Game Puzzles28%—
LiveBench Data Analysis—69.4%
LMCA52.2%—
ForecastBench60.3—
LiveBench—66.9%

Math Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude Opus 4.7: 66.5 (#20), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.1 (#127)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.8%57.8%
LMArena Math14991351
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)43.8%1.7%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)70.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 431.7%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions73.6%—
ProofBench54%—
Omni-MATH—45.9%
LiveBench Math—75.8%
MATH Level 5—82.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)22.9%—

Knowledge Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude Opus 4.7: 62.6 (#20), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#207)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)
GPQA Diamond90.2%64.1%
Humanity's Last Exam36.2%6.6%
LMArena Expert15211340
SimpleQA Verified51.7%—
MMLU-Pro—73.7%
Confabulations—12.4%
Vectara Hallucination Rate12%—
GPQA (HELM)—55.6%
MMLU—79.7%

Multimodal Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude Opus 4.7: 41.5 (#29), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 35.9 (#74)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)
LMArena Vision13171158
GeoBench—77%
Blueprint-Bench 224.5%—
Furniture Assembly33.3%—
LMArena Document1495—

Multilingual Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude Opus 4.7: 57.5 (#9), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.6 (#144)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)
LMArena Non-English14811342
LMArena Chinese15301373
LMArena French15051390
LMArena German14941354
LMArena Japanese14721293
LMArena Korean14661314
LMArena Russian14941351
LMArena Spanish14971363

Instruction Following Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude Opus 4.7: 78.6 (#9), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.6 (#91)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)
LMArena Instruction Following14981336
LiveBench Instruction Following—85.8%
IFEval—84.1%

Long Context Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude Opus 4.7: 46.1 (#24), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#198)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)
LMArena Longer Query15051345
Fiction.LiveBench—61.1%

Writing & Preference Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude Opus 4.7: 75.3 (#8), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.8 (#184)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)
LMArena Text14911354
LMArena Creative Writing14861340
EQ-Bench Creative Writing19141128
LMArena Multi-Turn15061350
Short-Story Creative Writing—73.8%
WildBench—80%
EQ-Bench 41311—
LiveBench Language—51.3%

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 4.7 better than Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)?

Claude Opus 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.4 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Opus 4.7 or Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better for coding?

Claude Opus 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.9 versus 28.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 4.7 and Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) share?

29 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 4.7 has 66 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54.

Related comparisons

Go deeper