Model comparison

Codellama 34b Instruct vs MiniMax-M3

MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 34b Instruct Meta

30.2

Rank #285 Confirmed

MiniMax-M3 MiniMax

43.5

Rank #81 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and MiniMax-M3 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M3 leads 62.3 to 28.4.

Side by side

Codellama 34b Instruct and MiniMax-M3 specifications
Codellama 34b InstructMiniMax-M3
ProviderMetaMiniMax
Noometry Index30.243.5
Released—2026-06-01
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—1M
Max output—512K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.30
Output $ / M tokens—$1.20
Results tracked1441

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M3 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.0 (#310), MiniMax-M3: 41.5 (#111)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiniMax-M3
LMArena Coding10461470
FrontierCode—14.7%
LMArena WebDev—1482
SciCode—47.1%
BigCodeBench Instruct29%—
BigCodeBench Complete37.1%—
ALE-Bench—640.02
HumanEval+43.9%—
MBPP+56.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, MiniMax-M3: 22.5 (#121)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiniMax-M3
APEX-Agents—37.7%
OSWorld 2.0—4.6%
GBAEval—0.9%
Vending-Bench 2—2,158

Reasoning MiniMax-M3 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 18.8 (#250), MiniMax-M3: 29.3 (#83)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiniMax-M3
LMArena Hard Prompts10321447
SimpleBench—45.8%
NYT Connections (extended)—65.1%
CritPt—3.7%
Chess Puzzles—14%
Mystery Game Puzzles—8%
DTBench—78.9%
LMCA—33.7%
Surface Evolver Bench—55%
Epoch Capabilities Index—147
ForecastBench—61.4

Math MiniMax-M3 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#227), MiniMax-M3: 39.1 (#83)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiniMax-M3
LMArena Math10561432
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—71.1%
ProofBench—18%

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, MiniMax-M3: 58.4 (#32)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiniMax-M3
GPQA Diamond—90.9%
LMArena Expert—1462

Multimodal Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, MiniMax-M3: 39.5 (#45)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiniMax-M3
LMArena Vision—1254
LMArena Document—1435

Multilingual MiniMax-M3 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.9 (#279), MiniMax-M3: 53.2 (#70)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiniMax-M3
LMArena Non-English10111420
LMArena Chinese9761465
LMArena French—1445
LMArena German—1424
LMArena Japanese—1381
LMArena Korean—1372
LMArena Russian—1430
LMArena Spanish—1431

Instruction Following MiniMax-M3 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.4 (#286), MiniMax-M3: 75.7 (#56)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiniMax-M3
LMArena Instruction Following10281433

Long Context MiniMax-M3 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.8 (#279), MiniMax-M3: 44.2 (#68)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiniMax-M3
LMArena Longer Query10141445

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M3 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.4 (#292), MiniMax-M3: 62.3 (#79)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiniMax-M3
LMArena Text10661433
LMArena Creative Writing10321405
LMArena Multi-Turn10151441
EQ-Bench 4—1150

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than MiniMax-M3?

MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 34b Instruct or MiniMax-M3 better for coding?

MiniMax-M3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.5 versus 28.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and MiniMax-M3 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M3 has 41.

Related comparisons

Go deeper