Model comparison

MiniMax-M3 vs Yi-1.5-34B

MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

MiniMax-M3 MiniMax

43.8

Rank #85 Confirmed

Yi-1.5-34B 01.AI

30.6

Rank #289 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax-M3 scores higher in 8 categories and Yi-1.5-34B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiniMax-M3 leads 58.4 to 14.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 90.9% for MiniMax-M3 and 32% for Yi-1.5-34B.

Side by side

MiniMax-M3 and Yi-1.5-34B specifications
MiniMax-M3Yi-1.5-34B
ProviderMiniMax01.AI
Noometry Index43.830.6
Released2026-06-012024-05-13
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1M—
Max output512K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.30—
Output $ / M tokens$1.20—
Results tracked4121

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M3 leads

MiniMax-M3: 41.8 (#118), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.4 (#272)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Coding14691169
FrontierCode14.7%—
LMArena WebDev1482—
SciCode47.1%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—33.9%
BigCodeBench Complete—43.8%
ALE-Bench640.02—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiniMax-M3: 22.6 (#130), Yi-1.5-34B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3Yi-1.5-34B
APEX-Agents37.7%—
OSWorld 2.04.6%—
GBAEval0.9%—
Vending-Bench 22,158—

Reasoning MiniMax-M3 leads

MiniMax-M3: 30.1 (#87), Yi-1.5-34B: 22.5 (#191)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Hard Prompts14471160
SimpleBench45.8%—
NYT Connections (extended)65.1%—
CritPt3.7%—
Chess Puzzles14%—
Mystery Game Puzzles8%—
DTBench78.9%—
LMCA33.7%—
Surface Evolver Bench55%—
Epoch Capabilities Index146.95—
ForecastBench61.4—

Math MiniMax-M3 leads

MiniMax-M3: 40.0 (#95), Yi-1.5-34B: 27.5 (#249)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Math14291182
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202571.1%—
ProofBench18%—
MATH Level 5—25.5%

Knowledge MiniMax-M3 leads

MiniMax-M3: 58.4 (#35), Yi-1.5-34B: 14.8 (#295)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3Yi-1.5-34B
GPQA Diamond90.9%32%
LMArena Expert14611144

Multimodal Not comparable

MiniMax-M3: 40.2 (#51), Yi-1.5-34B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Vision1253—
LMArena Document1435—

Multilingual MiniMax-M3 leads

MiniMax-M3: 53.0 (#75), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.3 (#256)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Non-English14201121
LMArena Chinese14631213
LMArena French14471156
LMArena German14261111
LMArena Japanese13811021
LMArena Korean13721005
LMArena Russian14281091
LMArena Spanish14321121

Instruction Following MiniMax-M3 leads

MiniMax-M3: 75.5 (#62), Yi-1.5-34B: 59.2 (#257)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Instruction Following14331139

Long Context MiniMax-M3 leads

MiniMax-M3: 44.2 (#72), Yi-1.5-34B: 34.6 (#248)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Longer Query14451143

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M3 leads

MiniMax-M3: 62.1 (#83), Yi-1.5-34B: 37.4 (#257)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Text14331173
LMArena Creative Writing14041135
LMArena Multi-Turn14421153
EQ-Bench 41150—

Frequently asked questions

Is MiniMax-M3 better than Yi-1.5-34B?

MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is MiniMax-M3 or Yi-1.5-34B better for coding?

MiniMax-M3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 32.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M3 and Yi-1.5-34B share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M3 has 41 scored results on Noometry and Yi-1.5-34B has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper