Model comparison
Codellama 34b Instruct vs Mistral Small 3.2
Codellama 34b Instruct and Mistral Small 3.2 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.8 vs 31.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Mistral AISummary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Small 3.2 leads 45.0 to 28.2.
Side by side
| Codellama 34b Instruct | Mistral Small 3.2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 31.2 |
| Released | — | 2025-06-20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 256K |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.0938 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.25 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1046 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 37.1% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 43.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 56.3% | — |
Reasoning Codellama 34b Instruct leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255), Mistral Small 3.2: 18.1 (#287)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 40.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1032 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 131.74 |
Math Codellama 34b Instruct leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230), Mistral Small 3.2: 26.3 (#260)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 30.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1056 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Mistral Small 3.2: 26.7 (#256)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 49.1% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1011 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 976 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1028 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1013 | — |
Writing & Preference Mistral Small 3.2 leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297), Mistral Small 3.2: 45.0 (#224)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1066 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1032 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1255 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1015 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Mistral Small 3.2?
Codellama 34b Instruct and Mistral Small 3.2 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.8 vs 31.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Mistral Small 3.2 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3.2 has 6.