Model comparison

Codellama 34b Instruct vs Phi-4

Codellama 34b Instruct and Phi-4 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.8 vs 31.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 34b Instruct Meta

30.8

Rank #287 Confirmed

Phi-4 Microsoft

31.2

Rank #279 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 2 categories and Phi-4 in 5 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Phi-4 leads 40.5 to 28.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 37.1% for Codellama 34b Instruct and 55.4% for Phi-4.

Side by side

Codellama 34b Instruct and Phi-4 specifications
Codellama 34b InstructPhi-4
ProviderMetaMicrosoft
Noometry Index30.831.2
Released—2024-12-11
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—4K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.07
Output $ / M tokens—$0.14
Results tracked1437

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Phi-4 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314), Phi-4: 34.4 (#239)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructPhi-4
BigCodeBench Instruct29%45.5%
LMArena Coding10461231
BigCodeBench Complete37.1%55.4%
LiveBench Coding—30.7%
HumanEval+43.9%—
MBPP+56.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Phi-4: 22.8 (#128)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructPhi-4
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—28.8%
BALROG—11.6%

Reasoning Codellama 34b Instruct leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255), Phi-4: 17.7 (#291)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructPhi-4
LMArena Hard Prompts10321220
Chess Puzzles—1%
LiveBench Reasoning—47.8%
LiveBench Data Analysis—45.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—130.42
LiveBench—41.6%

Math Codellama 34b Instruct leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230), Phi-4: 20.8 (#285)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructPhi-4
LMArena Math10561246
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—13.8%
LiveBench Math—42%
MATH Level 5—64.9%

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Phi-4: 32.6 (#209)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructPhi-4
GPQA Diamond—56.1%
Confabulations—29.4%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—3.7%
LMArena Expert—1203
MMLU—84.8%

Multilingual Phi-4 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284), Phi-4: 37.2 (#237)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructPhi-4
LMArena Non-English10111197
LMArena Chinese9761212
LMArena French—1224
LMArena German—1222
LMArena Japanese—1158
LMArena Korean—1151
LMArena Russian—1209
LMArena Spanish—1234

Instruction Following Phi-4 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291), Phi-4: 60.4 (#251)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructPhi-4
LMArena Instruction Following10281201
LiveBench Instruction Following—58.4%

Long Context Phi-4 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284), Phi-4: 36.9 (#226)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructPhi-4
LMArena Longer Query10131217

Writing & Preference Phi-4 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297), Phi-4: 40.5 (#244)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructPhi-4
LMArena Text10661217
LMArena Creative Writing10321182
LMArena Multi-Turn10151206
Short-Story Creative Writing—62.6%
LiveBench Language—25.6%

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Phi-4?

Codellama 34b Instruct and Phi-4 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.8 vs 31.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Phi-4 better for coding?

Phi-4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.4 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Phi-4 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper