Model comparison
Codellama 70b Instruct vs GLM-4.6V
GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-4.6V in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where GLM-4.6V leads 48.6 to 24.8.
Side by side
| Codellama 70b Instruct | GLM-4.6V | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 41.3 |
| Released | — | 2025-12-08 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.90 |
| Results tracked | 7 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.6V leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193), GLM-4.6V: 40.9 (#128)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1390 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |
Reasoning GLM-4.6V leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242), GLM-4.6V: 27.6 (#115)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1368 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, GLM-4.6V: 38.0 (#149)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1371 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, GLM-4.6V: 34.8 (#90)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1164 |
Multilingual GLM-4.6V leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288), GLM-4.6V: 48.6 (#141)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1359 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1425 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1340 |
Instruction Following GLM-4.6V leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293), GLM-4.6V: 71.4 (#151)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1352 |
Long Context Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#143)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1358 |
Writing & Preference GLM-4.6V leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277), GLM-4.6V: 56.6 (#137)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1377 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1347 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1360 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than GLM-4.6V?
GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codellama 70b Instruct or GLM-4.6V better for coding?
GLM-4.6V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and GLM-4.6V share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.6V has 12.