Model comparison

Codellama 70b Instruct vs Grok 3

Grok 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 70b Instruct Meta

33.3

Rank #236 Confirmed

Grok 3 xAI

39.6

Rank #150 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Grok 3 in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where Grok 3 leads 52.5 to 24.9.
  • Codellama 70b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Codellama 70b Instruct and Grok 3 specifications
Codellama 70b InstructGrok 3
ProviderMetaxAI
Noometry Index33.339.6
Released—2025-04-09
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked740

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 3 leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.0 (#189), Grok 3: 41.5 (#113)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGrok 3
Aider Polyglot—53.3%
WeirdML—37.2%
BigCodeBench Instruct40.7%—
LMArena Coding—1432
BigCodeBench Complete49.6%—
HumanEval+65.9%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Grok 3: 30.2 (#69)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGrok 3
BALROG—29.5%

Reasoning Codellama 70b Instruct leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 19.2 (#241), Grok 3: 13.8 (#322)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGrok 3
LMArena Hard Prompts10521433
ARC-AGI-2—0%
SimpleBench—36.1%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—61.3%
ARC-AGI-1—5.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—138.34

Math Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Grok 3: 36.2 (#122)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGrok 3
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—55.6%
Omni-MATH—46.4%
LMArena Math—1390
MATH Level 5—88.7%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—3.8%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—0%

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Grok 3: 46.0 (#76)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGrok 3
GPQA Diamond—75.8%
MMLU-Pro—78.8%
Confabulations—14.2%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.8%
GPQA (HELM)—65%
LMArena Expert—1420

Multilingual Grok 3 leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.9 (#283), Grok 3: 52.5 (#81)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGrok 3
LMArena Non-English9921411
LMArena Chinese—1448
LMArena French—1460
LMArena German—1431
LMArena Japanese—1389
LMArena Korean—1374
LMArena Russian—1416
LMArena Spanish—1417

Instruction Following Grok 3 leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 52.1 (#288), Grok 3: 75.2 (#69)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGrok 3
LMArena Instruction Following10241409
IFEval—88.4%

Long Context Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Grok 3: 38.7 (#187)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGrok 3
Fiction.LiveBench—58.3%
LMArena Longer Query—1439

Writing & Preference Grok 3 leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.6 (#272), Grok 3: 56.0 (#136)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGrok 3
LMArena Text10571426
LMArena Creative Writing—1414
Short-Story Creative Writing—76.4%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1186
WildBench—84.9%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1424

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Grok 3?

Grok 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Grok 3 better for coding?

Grok 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.5 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Grok 3 share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Grok 3 has 40.

Related comparisons

Go deeper