Model comparison

Codellama 70b Instruct vs Mistral Medium 3.5

Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 70b Instruct Meta

33.3

Rank #236 Confirmed

Mistral Medium 3.5 Mistral AI

39.6

Rank #151 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 2 categories and Mistral Medium 3.5 in 3 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where Mistral Medium 3.5 leads 52.1 to 24.9.

Side by side

Codellama 70b Instruct and Mistral Medium 3.5 specifications
Codellama 70b InstructMistral Medium 3.5
ProviderMetaMistral AI
Noometry Index33.339.6
Released——
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—210K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked722

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Codellama 70b Instruct leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.0 (#189), Mistral Medium 3.5: 35.7 (#208)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena WebDev—1263
BigCodeBench Instruct40.7%—
LMArena Coding—1461
BigCodeBench Complete49.6%—
HumanEval+65.9%—

Reasoning Codellama 70b Instruct leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 19.2 (#241), Mistral Medium 3.5: 16.6 (#290)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Hard Prompts10521436
Kagi LLM Benchmark—41.4%
NYT Connections (extended)—12.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index—141.42

Math Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Mistral Medium 3.5: 36.4 (#113)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Math—1432

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Mistral Medium 3.5: 39.3 (#123)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Expert—1431

Multimodal Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Mistral Medium 3.5: 37.6 (#64)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Vision—1222

Multilingual Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.9 (#283), Mistral Medium 3.5: 52.1 (#93)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Non-English9921405
LMArena Chinese—1443
LMArena French—1448
LMArena German—1453
LMArena Korean—1387
LMArena Russian—1396
LMArena Spanish—1406

Instruction Following Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 52.1 (#288), Mistral Medium 3.5: 74.7 (#87)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Instruction Following10241414

Long Context Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Mistral Medium 3.5: 43.2 (#101)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Longer Query—1414

Writing & Preference Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.6 (#272), Mistral Medium 3.5: 58.6 (#113)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text10571421
LMArena Creative Writing—1372
EQ-Bench 4—993
LMArena Multi-Turn—1423

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Mistral Medium 3.5?

Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Mistral Medium 3.5 better for coding?

Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 35.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Mistral Medium 3.5 share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.5 has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper