Model comparison

Codellama 70b Instruct vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.5 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 70b Instruct Meta

33.3

Rank #236 Confirmed

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent xAI

45.5

Rank #62 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads 64.1 to 33.6.
  • Codellama 70b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Codellama 70b Instruct and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent specifications
Codellama 70b InstructGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
ProviderMetaxAI
Noometry Index33.345.5
Released—2026-03-09
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—30K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$2.50
Results tracked720

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.0 (#189), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 42.4 (#91)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
BigCodeBench Instruct40.7%—
LMArena Coding—1458
BigCodeBench Complete49.6%—
HumanEval+65.9%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Search—1204

Reasoning Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 19.2 (#241), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 42.4 (#44)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Hard Prompts10521448
NYT Connections (extended)—89.6%

Math Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 36.6 (#106)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Math—1441

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.7 (#116)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Expert—1445

Multimodal Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.8 (#44)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Vision—1259

Multilingual Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.9 (#283), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 54.6 (#40)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Non-English9921440
LMArena Chinese—1475
LMArena French—1467
LMArena German—1456
LMArena Japanese—1405
LMArena Korean—1416
LMArena Russian—1457
LMArena Spanish—1447

Instruction Following Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 52.1 (#288), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 75.0 (#80)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Instruction Following10241420

Long Context Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.7 (#84)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Longer Query—1430

Writing & Preference Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.6 (#272), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 64.1 (#57)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Text10571450
LMArena Creative Writing—1435
LMArena Multi-Turn—1451

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.5 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent better for coding?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 20.

Related comparisons

Go deeper