Model comparison
Codellama 70b Instruct vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 63.9 to 33.6.
Side by side
| Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 33.3 | 44.4 |
| Released | — | 2026-09-22 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 7 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.0 (#189), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.3 (#68)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1516 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 19.2 (#241), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 29.6 (#82)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1481 |
Math Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 37.4 (#97)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1477 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.0 (#91)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1516 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.2 (#39)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1266 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.9 (#283), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.6 (#41)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1439 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1501 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1424 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 52.1 (#288), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 77.0 (#33)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1463 |
Long Context Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#52)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1465 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.6 (#272), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.9 (#61)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1459 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1408 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1460 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codellama 70b Instruct or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.3 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 13.