Model comparison

Codellama 70b Instruct vs o3-mini

o3-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 70b Instruct Meta

33.7

Rank #237 Confirmed

o3-mini OpenAI

36.7

Rank #212 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and o3-mini in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in instruction following, where o3-mini leads 75.1 to 51.9.
  • Codellama 70b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Codellama 70b Instruct and o3-mini specifications
Codellama 70b Instructo3-mini
ProviderMetaOpenAI
Noometry Index33.736.7
Released—2024-12-20
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—200K
Max output—100K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.10
Output $ / M tokens—$4.40
Results tracked751

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding o3-mini leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193), o3-mini: 40.8 (#132)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b Instructo3-mini
Aider Polyglot—60.4%
SciCode—39.8%
GSO—1.3%
WeirdML—43.7%
BigCodeBench Instruct40.7%—
LiveBench Coding—82.7%
LMArena Coding—1378
BigCodeBench Complete49.6%—
CadEval—54%
HumanEval+65.9%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, o3-mini: 29.6 (#84)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b Instructo3-mini
Cybench—22.5%

Reasoning Codellama 70b Instruct leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242), o3-mini: 16.3 (#305)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b Instructo3-mini
LMArena Hard Prompts10521366
ARC-AGI-2—3%
SimpleBench—22.8%
ARC-AGI-1—34.5%
CritPt—0.3%
Chess Puzzles—17%
LiveBench Reasoning—89.6%
Mystery Game Puzzles—7%
DTBench—68.8%
LiveBench Data Analysis—70.6%
LMCA—19%
Epoch Capabilities Index—140.34
ForecastBench—59.6
LiveBench—75.9%

Math Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, o3-mini: 28.1 (#244)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b Instructo3-mini
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—18.6%
FrontierMath Tier 4—0%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—76.9%
LiveBench Math—77.3%
LMArena Math—1396
MATH Level 5—96.5%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—12.4%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—4.2%

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, o3-mini: 38.3 (#146)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b Instructo3-mini
GPQA Diamond—77%
SimpleQA Verified—15.3%
Confabulations—17.9%
LMArena Expert—1364

Multilingual o3-mini leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288), o3-mini: 45.7 (#164)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b Instructo3-mini
LMArena Non-English9921319
LMArena Chinese—1379
LMArena French—1334
LMArena German—1303
LMArena Japanese—1286
LMArena Korean—1314
LMArena Russian—1304
LMArena Spanish—1321

Instruction Following o3-mini leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293), o3-mini: 75.1 (#72)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b Instructo3-mini
LMArena Instruction Following10241337
LiveBench Instruction Following—84.4%

Long Context Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, o3-mini: 33.8 (#256)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b Instructo3-mini
Fiction.LiveBench—50%
LMArena Longer Query—1343

Writing & Preference o3-mini leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277), o3-mini: 50.3 (#182)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b Instructo3-mini
LMArena Text10571337
LMArena Creative Writing—1286
Short-Story Creative Writing—61.7%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1320
LiveBench Language—50.7%

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than o3-mini?

o3-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 70b Instruct or o3-mini better for coding?

o3-mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and o3-mini share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and o3-mini has 51.

Related comparisons

Go deeper