Model comparison

Codestral vs Command R

Codestral and Command R score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.6 vs 31.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Codestral Mistral AI

30.6

Rank #290 Reported

Command R Cohere

31.4

Rank #272 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Codestral scores higher in 1 category and Command R in 1 category; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Codestral leads 19.8 to 13.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 52.5% for Codestral and 45.2% for Command R.
  • Command R is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.60 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $0.90 for Codestral.
  • Codestral accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 128K.
  • Command R has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Codestral and Command R specifications
CodestralCommand R
ProviderMistral AICohere
Noometry Index30.631.4
Released2024-05-292024-08-30
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window256K128K
Max output8K4K
Input $ / M tokens$0.30$0.15
Output $ / M tokens$0.90$0.60
Results tracked729

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Command R leads

Codestral: 27.3 (#321), Command R: 29.3 (#306)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralCommand R
BigCodeBench Instruct41.8%37.1%
BigCodeBench Complete52.5%45.2%
Aider Polyglot11.1%—
LiveBench Coding—17.9%
LMArena Coding—1169
ALE-Bench137.78—
HumanEval+73.8%—
MBPP+61.9%—

Reasoning Codestral leads

Codestral: 19.8 (#251), Command R: 13.8 (#331)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralCommand R
Kagi LLM Benchmark32.5%—
LiveBench Reasoning—21.9%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1164
DTBench—46.4%
LiveBench Data Analysis—33.3%
LMCA—9.2%
LiveBench—27.5%

Math Not comparable

Codestral: —, Command R: 28.0 (#246)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralCommand R
LiveBench Math—19.4%
LMArena Math—1155

Knowledge Not comparable

Codestral: —, Command R: 31.0 (#221)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralCommand R
LMArena Expert—1138
MMLU—65.2%

Multilingual Not comparable

Codestral: —, Command R: 35.7 (#245)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralCommand R
LMArena Non-English—1174
LMArena Chinese—1182
LMArena French—1162
LMArena German—1176
LMArena Japanese—1143
LMArena Korean—1163
LMArena Russian—1174
LMArena Spanish—1151

Instruction Following Not comparable

Codestral: —, Command R: 58.1 (#261)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralCommand R
LiveBench Instruction Following—55.6%
LMArena Instruction Following—1167

Long Context Not comparable

Codestral: —, Command R: 36.3 (#231)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralCommand R
LMArena Longer Query—1198

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Codestral: —, Command R: 38.2 (#254)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralCommand R
LMArena Text—1187
LMArena Creative Writing—1170
LMArena Multi-Turn—1163
LiveBench Language—16.7%

Frequently asked questions

Is Codestral better than Command R?

Codestral and Command R score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.6 vs 31.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, Codestral or Command R?

Command R is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Codestral lists at $0.30 and $0.90.

Is Codestral or Command R better for coding?

Command R scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.3 versus 27.3 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Codestral does, with 256K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Codestral and Command R share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codestral has 7 scored results on Noometry and Command R has 29.

Related comparisons

Go deeper